Although I began my application for citizenship over a year ago, frustratingly I am still merely a lawful permanent resident. I had hoped that I would not only be a citizen but a registered voter by the time November 8 rolled round. But I’m still on a green card and watching from the sidelines.

Apart from two posts that explored (but did not endorse) possible reasons for Donald Trump’s primary victories (here and here), I’ve therefore largely restrained myself from speaking on the presidential election. However, as increasingly large numbers of pastors and Christian leaders have taken very strong public positions, I’ve asked myself, “What would you do if you were a citizen and you could vote?” It’s also a question I’ve been repeatedly asked by others.

So, here’s what I’d do if I could vote.

I’d be planning to vote, and I know who I’d vote for, but I wouldn’t tell you who it is.

I know it sounds cowardly, and I may be accused of abdicating leadership, but here’s my reasoning.

Loss of Gospel Capital
I’ve watched numerous pastors and Christian leaders come out publicly for one of a range of options: voting Donald Trump, voting Hillary Clinton, voting third party, voting a write-in, not voting, voting anyone-but-Trump, or voting anyone-but Clinton.

The immediate result is that a tranche of like-minded people rally to their side; but, in doing so, they also alienate and antagonize even larger numbers of people choosing the other options. In a year when political passions are running such a high fever, I just don’t think that making one’s 2016 choice public is worth the loss of Gospel credibility, Gospel capital, and Gospel opportunity.

Of course, it’s possible that taking a “secret vote” stance may itself carry a cost with some, but I reckon it’s pretty minimal compared to the other options.

There are ministers and Christian leaders who are going to find it very difficult to recover from their 2016 stances. I’ve repeatedly heard people saying or writing that they will never listen to or read Pastor-so-and-so again because of his political stance. I know congregations where people are privately fizzing, and sometimes publicly fuming, because of their pastor’s stated (and even “suspected”) presidential choice. That’s not going to be easily or speedily healed.

I have to be honest, I’ve been pretty annoyed at some people too for their stances, and it’s going to take me a while to separate their political preferences from their ministries and get back to pre-2016 relationships.

Complexity and Confusion
If the choice was morally clearer, then I’d have less hesitation in taking and recommending a public stance. The cost in terms of Gospel capital would be irrelevant. But given the extreme moral complexity surrounding each option, is it worth risking the loss of Gospel usefulness for the sake of making one’s presidential preference public?

People who know me best, and whom I trust, know which option I would take. We’ve talked about it a lot as a family and watched just about every debate since the primary season began. But I’ve also asked my children at various points to keep their parents’ views private so as not to create unnecessary barriers to and distractions from the Gospel.

So, although I cannot cast my ballot on November 8, I have been praying for all who will. I’ve also been praying for God to overrule everything for the good of his church. And now I’ve begun to pray that God would minimize the damage to Christian leaders and ministries whose controversial political stances have put them at odds with other Christians. May God grant a sense of perspective when the dust settles and enable us to seek peace and pursue it, for the glory of God and the advance of the Gospel.

  • John Moerman

    “There are ministers and Christian leaders who are going to find it very difficult to recover from their 2016 stances.” I think that, when pastors and leaders get all heated up over their views, the real loss lies in their lack of confidence in God Himself! Frankly, I’m more relaxed this election cycle than the last. God will not be stopped.

    • David Murray

      Great perspective!

  • Kathleen A. Peck

    Kudos to you Dr. Murray, this might be the very best piece written to date by a minister with a public platform. I’ve been wondering when someone well known would do this … discuss the election yet refrain from telling people who they’re going to vote for. By stating things such as “I’d never vote for _________ or ________ but I would vote for _________ they are essentially influencing others to follow them as they take the moral high ground. This hasn’t been very helpful whatsoever.
    There’s been so much shaming, blaming, accusing, abusing, it’s been astounding! It’s a complex election & who to vote for or whether to vote at all is an issue many believers are having to grapple with. May your gentle words & guiding your readers Godward help us as we do.

  • http://asmallwork.wordpress.com/ Ryan Higginbottom

    I appreciate this post, Dr. Murray. I agree that pastors may lose “gospel capital” by revealing who they will vote for. However, this raises a question. An election is certainly a ripe opportunity for discipleship, helping friends/congregants think through issues and how their vote translates into loving neighbor. Do you have any reflections or advice on how to disciple/train/lead a congregation through these important matters without losing gospel capital? Thanks!

    • David Murray

      Yes, Ryan, I agree with you on the need for teaching on this. Ideally this should be done over the long-term so that principles can be defined and policies critiqued before it becomes too personal in terms of who the candidates are. Nearer an election, these principles can then be referred to again to help people make their decisions with a good conscience.

  • Pingback: *👉💙👏David Murray – If I could vote, I’d vote for…  | yozefel's Blog

  • David Murray

    :)