David Murray - Leadership for Servants
Tag Archive - Preaching

How to Preach a Viral Sermon

May 15, 2013 • By David Murray • 4 Comments

Most viral videos share at least two things in common: “discussability” and “relatability.” So says Video CEO Analyst Brian Shin in Here’s why these 6 videos went viral.

“Discussable” means that it contains something shocking or surprising, which compels viewers to share it with others.

“Relatable” means that it has a deeply human element which we connect with emotionally and want to share with others.

As you read on, “simplicity” also emerges as an important factor; viral videos have a clear structure that’s easy to follow and remember.

That sounds like some helpful criteria for a sermon doesn’t it: ”Discussable,” “relatable,” and “simple.”

Do our sermons prompt discussion? There’s nothing more surprising or shocking than grace! So why do most sermons send people to sleep? Perhaps we’re not preaching grace. Or maybe our sermons answer too many questions, producing passive listeners. Why not pose more questions, leave them unanswered, and challenge hearers to seek their own answers from the Word and from one another?

Do they connect with the heart? Many sermons are not “earthed.” They float above hearers’ intellectual level, or they just don’t sound like “real life.” They may be full of theology, logic, and argumentation, but the emotions remain refrigerated.

Are they as simple in content and structure as possible? I’ve written on this before in A plea for profound simplicity. The most important book I’ve ever read for sermon preparation was William Zinser’s On Writing Well, especially pages 7-23. In fact if I had the choice of choosing two pages from any book, that I wanted every preacher to read it would be pages 10-11 in Zinser’s book where he takes the knife to a manuscript!

“Discussable,” “relatable,” and “simple.”

And who knows, with God’s blessing, maybe “viral” too!

Snapshot Sermons

Mar 14, 2013 • By David Murray • 4 Comments

“Sum up four years of your life in a 60-second video.”

That’s the challenge Huntington Willard, director of Duke University’s Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, has set his doctoral students. In addition to their dissertation, they are to submit a “snapshot dissertation,” 30-60 second video summing up the hundreds of pages and thousands of hours they’ve poured into it.

You can hear the squeals already, can’t you? I have two friends who completed scientific doctorates, and over the years I must have asked them a dozen times each to explain their work to me. Despite many glassy-eyed hours, I’m still none the wiser.

“I’ve always been convinced of the need for scholars to be able to speak ‘in plain English’ to people outside of the academy,” said Willard. “I teach [students] to imagine explaining what they’re learning to their parents or grandparents.” It’s all part of Duke’s Scholars and Public initiative to forge greater connections between the academy and the community.

For the same reason, no matter how much it makes us squeal, preachers (and teachers) should be “forced” (or should force themselves) to sum up their sermon (or lesson) in one sentence. For example, here’s a “Snapshot Sermon” on Psalm 2:

As God offers peace to his enemies before He defeats them, embrace His Son of Peace before He becomes your Judge.

The main points of the sermon were:

  1. The Lord has multiple enemies (1-3)
  2. The Lord will defeat His enemies (4-9)
  3. The Lord offers peace to His enemies (10-12)

We want to compare the snapshot sermon with the main points and ask:

  • Is it comprehensive? Does the summary cover all the main points of the sermon?
  • Is it unified? Do the different parts make up one whole or just lots of disconnected parts?
  • Is it simple? Remove passive voice, complex clauses, technical language, etc?
  • Is it short? Can I say this in fewer words without sacrificing the meaning?
  • Is it purposeful? Does it explain the point, the end, the aim of the sermon?
  • Is it worth it? Sometimes this exercise reveals that for all the good things in the sermon, there’s actually no real substance in it or no great point to it.

Apart from preventing some sermons being preached that should never be preached, this exercise also reveals if we’ve really mastered our subject. It also helps the preacher hone his material, cutting out anything that doesn’t connect with and support the snapshot. In the act of preaching the snapshot helps the preacher to achieve disciplined focus, forward momentum, and fitting climax.

Why not try it…and listen for the squeals.

A Balanced Preaching Menu [Video]

Mar 4, 2013 • By David Murray • 1 Comment

Are you serving up a balanced diet to your congregation? In this video I give a brief summary of ten kinds of sermon (email and RSS click here to view video)

  1. Doctrinal Sermons
  2. Theistic Sermons
  3. Apologetic Sermons
  4. Controversial Sermons
  5. Practical Sermons
  6. Historical/Biographical sermons
  7. Experiential Sermons
  8. Topical Sermons
  9. Evangelistic Sermons
  10. Discriminatory Sermons

Previous videos in the How Sermons Work series here.

200 Preaching Resources

Feb 26, 2013 • By David Murray • 10 Comments

Over the past few years I’ve been bookmarking blog articles on subjects that interest me. When preparing a lecture on electronic resources for my Preaching Class students, I was surprised to discover that I had accumulated 200+ of these on the subject of preaching. So here you go, a Homiletics Course in one blog post!

Preaching that Cuts to the Heart – The Gospel Coalition Blog

Delivery Dynamics: Are You You? | Biblical Preaching

What does cooking meals have to do with sermons? | Not So Common Sense Blog

Delivery Dynamics: Will They Listen | Biblical Preaching

Borrowed Light: Suggested Resources On Preaching

8 Ways to Pray During Sermon Preparation | 9Marks

Workman’s Toolbox – 5.2.13

Clarity and discretion – Reformation21 Blog

Preaching and Complementarity « Miscellanies.

You or We?

“On Preaching Christ from Daniel” by Sidney Greidanus

Strawberry-Rhubarb Theology: Thoughts for Guest Preachers, and the Churches That Invite Them

John Piper’s Sermon Preparation | Alex Chediak

How Do You Define Preaching? 3 – Pure Church by Thabiti Anyabwile

Don Carson’s Lectures On Preaching

The Secret to Spurgeon’s Evangelistic Ministry by Steven Lawson | Ligonier Ministries Blog

How long?

Every Pastor is a Translator | H.B. Charles Jr.

Pyromaniacs: Ways to profit from an expository sermon

Making Truth Memorable | Biblical Preaching

10 Questions For Expositors – Brian Croft

Preacher School #5: Outline the Passage

Expositional Preaching In Housing Schemes? What A Joke! « niddriepastor

Between The Times

I Preach for Me | Leadership Journal

Read the Text, the Whole Text and Nothing but the Text!

What You’ll Never Hear About Preaching in Seminary: Theological Matters

The Struggle for Reference Simplicity

Deep Preaching: Theological Matters

Fundamentals of Expository Preaching – YouTube

How to Transition Between the Points of Your Sermon without Losing Your Audience | Pastoralized

5 things I wish I had known as a young pastor – News with a Christian Perspective

Neither Padded, Nor Dense – 2 | Biblical Preaching

The Craft of Life-Changing Preaching – The Gospel Coalition Blog

Ways to Capture and Hold Attention, Part 2 | hopeingod.org

Ways to Capture and Hold Attention, Part 1 | hopeingod.org

The Missing Ingredient in Many Sermons | Ordinary Pastor

Be Careful with How-To Sermons | joethorn.net

Preaching and Sermon Preparation – Reformed Forum

Things I’ve Learned Along the Way… | H.B. Charles Jr.

Moore to the Point – Good News for Bad Preachers

How should a pastor respond when he is complimented about his sermon? | Practical Shepherding

Preaching to the Mixed Congregation | Biblical Preaching

Four Rules for Preachers – Justin Taylor

How to Guarantee Your Sermon Illustrations Succeed by Eric McKiddie – ChurchLeaders.com 

Stop preaching only to the choir? | The Briefing

Ed Stetzer – Preaching “One-Time” Sermons

Planks and Slices 2 – Preaching Plank Grains | Biblical Preaching

8 rules for preachers from Luther – Reformation21 Blog

BibleX: Teaching vs. Preaching

The Personality of the Preacher 3 | Biblical Preaching

The Personality of the Preacher 2 | Biblical Preaching

The Personality of the Preacher | Biblical Preaching

Pointers for Preaching Epistles Effectively – Pt.5

The dilemma of preaching and hearing God’s word | The Briefing

25 Pointers for Preaching Epistles Effectively | Biblical Preaching

Applying the Sermon: Watch out for Pits, Walls and Stones « Preaching Barefoot

Preaching to the Heart | Biblical Preaching

First Sermon Jitters: Help for Aspiring Preachers

Preaching and Word Studies | Biblical Preaching

Becoming Well-Spoken: How to Minimize Your Uh’s and Um’s | The Art of Manliness

The real skill of preparation | The Proclamation Trust

Preachers on Preaching | The Cripplegate

Tuning the Preacher’s Ear | Books and Culture

(42) Ask RC- What’s the difference between teaching and preaching?

Teaching preaching | The Briefing

Paper or Plastic? Why I hate handwritten sermon notes | The Cripplegate

Deeper Application – Blog – DashHouse.com

Reflections on Great Bible Teaching – Part 1

Extended Gestation | Biblical Preaching

How We Are Judged by Our Voice in Dating and the Workplace | Psychology Today

40 Lessons I’ve Learned About Preaching After My 400th Sermon | Pastoralized

Preaching to the Mixed Congregation

Sermon preparation – Ray Ortlund

5 Ways to Immediately Improve Your Preaching | Ordinary Pastor

Stop using illustrations | The Proclamation Trust

Preaching from an iPad | The Proclamation Trust

6 Bullet Points on Preaching | Challies Dot Com

How to Preach Like Phil Ryken and Duane Litfin Without Sounding Like Them | Pastoralized

The Centrality of Preaching « Reformed Baptist Fellowship

The Value of Sermon Introductions: How to Stop Giving Your Congregation Theological Whiplash | Pastoralized

15 Ways to Improve Clarity | Biblical Preaching

Tim Keller on Writing a Sermon – YouTube

The one sentence most public speakers get wrong | Articles

9 Reasons Why I Preach Expositionally by Danny Slavich -SermonCentral.com

The Upward Call – Affective Preaching

Sermon notes | The Proclamation Trust

Is preaching without notes the most authentic? Part 2 | The Proclamation Trust

3 Things Photographers Can Teach You about Developing an Eye for Sermon Illustrations | Pastoralized

Exiled Preacher: Preaching: A Beginners’ Guide (1)

5 Ways Pastors Can Improve Their Apologetic Preaching – The Gospel Coalition Blog

Pastors: Don’t Just Quote but Be Quotable | Ordinary Pastor

Why Expository Preaching is the Power for Pastoral Ministry | Dr. Michael A. Milton’s Blog

The Christian Curmudgeon: Don’t Tase Me, Bro

Four Easy (and often overlooked) Tips that Could Improve Your Preaching | Ordinary Pastor

Founders Ministries Blog: The need for discriminating preaching and the danger of its absence

Application in Sermons – White Horse Inn Blog

Guest Post: Ligon Duncan on Lloyd-Jones – Kevin DeYoung

An Interview with Albert N. Martin about his book Preaching in the Holy Spirit. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011, 67 pp., paperback. « Biblical Spirituality

When Presenting, Remember to Pause – Jerry Weissman – Harvard Business Review

TGC Asks: How Do You Preach a ‘One Time’ Sermon? – The Gospel Coalition Blog

A Call for Authoritative Preaching

The difference between a lecture and a sermon – Reformation21 Blog

Preaching Through Joshua | Preaching.com

Flattery Can Kill – The Gospel Coalition Blog

Speak Up, Preacher! | 9Marks

10 steps to better preaching | Mission-minded Church | Sydneyanglicans.net

Maybe I Do Want Topical Preaching? | 9Marks

Preaching during the Christmas Season – Reformation21 Blog

Don’t Strive To Be a Great Preacher – Reformation21 Blog

The Gospel-Driven Church: Preaching with the Grain

BibleX: Five Crucial Sermon Questions

Preaching for Application – Justin Taylor

Quote unquote | The Proclamation Trust

BibleX: The Value of a Good Outline

Should Preachers Show Their Work? Or, Should Our Preaching Train People to Read the Bible? | For His Renown

Adam’s Apple: Preaching from an iPad | The Cripplegate

Hearing Both Sides Of The Preaching Debate « unashamed

More Thoughts on Sermon Manuscripts « Provocations & Pantings

7 Reasons in Support of Consecutive Exposition of the Scripture

Why context matters… | The Proclamation Trust

Evaluating Your Sermon One Hour Later | 9Marks

GUEST POST – Billy Graham, the first sincere preacher many had heard

Some Criteria for Evaluating Preachers and Preaching

Luther on sermon length « Expository Thoughts

An assessment of preaching « The Wanderer

Moving Toward Noteless | Biblical Preaching

Themelios | Article: A Preachers Decalogue – The Gospel Coalition

Preaching Today: A Discussion with Jared Wilson and Tony Merida « Modern March | church theology culture

Take Your Vitamin Z: The Difference Between Great and Mediocre

Writing A Book – Structure

Paul Washer on Homiletics | The Cripplegate

How long should my sermons be when I preach? | Practical Shepherding

Help in Preaching the Hardest Sermons – Justin Taylor

Writing Style 7 | Euangelion

Forrest Gump-ing Your Way to a “Good” Sermon | Blogging Theologically | Jesus, Books, Culture, & Theology

Principles for preaching « The Wanderer

Lloyd-Jones on the Practice of Real Preaching – The Gospel Coalition Blog

The Big Idea | DashHouse.com

Meditate Your Way To A More Creative Mind | Fast Company

Introducing the 2011 EMA books (1) | The Proclamation Trust

The Power in Persuasion: An Interview with N.D. Wilson and Doug Wilson – TGC Reviews

Christoph Niemann on Happiness, Work and Creativity | Brain Pickings

Pyromaniacs: On the Folly of Preaching too Long

Dale Ralph Davis on Preaching and Praying the Psalms « unashamed

What Tone Should Preachers Aim At? – Desiring God

A Presenter’s Guide to Remembering What to Say – Jerry Weissman – The Conversation – Harvard Business Review

How to Improve Your Public Speaking by Practicing Out Loud

7 Ways to Preach a Lousy Sermon by Ken Collins -SermonCentral.com

7 Marks of Great Preaching by David Lose -SermonCentral.com

Practical Tips for Expository Preachers | Crossway

Urban Legends: The Preacher’s Edition : Kingdom People

How Shall They Hear Without a Preacher? – Reformation21

Preaching: Simple, not Simplistic | NWBingham.com

BibleX: Should Non-Preachers Read Preaching Books?

Preaching evangelistically without preaching a bolt on | The Proclamation Trust

What is Homiletics? on Vimeo

Six Keys to Poor Preaching

YouTube – What is Redemptive-Historical Preaching?

Paradoxically Speaking: Simple Preaching

Q & A on Preaching – Vaughan Roberts « unashamed

Voice lessons | The Christian Century

6 Advantages Of Consecutive Expository Preaching | NWBingham.com

Don’t be afraid to preach to the affections | The Proclamation Trust

Get Ready for Your Pastor’s Next Sermon Dud! – Pure Church by Thabiti Anyabwile

Notes from My Speech Coach

Evangelistic Preaching on Sunday Morning? – Justin Taylor

Simplicity and love in preaching | The Proclamation Trust

The Peculiar Pleasure of Difficult Sermons « unashamed

The Three Basic Forms of Defective Preaching « Building Old School Churches

3 Reasons Why PowerPoint Preaching is Not Prophetic

7 Tips for Public Speaking Without All the Notes

How do you do expositional preaching poorly? | 9Marks

Greg Beale on Preaching

Preaching that Paints the Sheeding of Christ’s Blood - Feeding on Christ

C.S. Lewis’s Advice on Writing Well – Justin Taylor

Derek Tidball Lectures on Preaching – Justin Taylor

A Classical Analysis of Puritan Preaching – Reformation21

Richard Gaffin Lectures: Reformed Hermeneutics – Justin Taylor

Preaching to the Whole Choir – Kevin DeYoung

Consider how you listen – Reformation21 Blog

Josh Moody on Preaching – Justin Taylor

Feeding on Christ » Blog Archive » The Apostolic Hermenuetic: Preaching Christ From All The Scriptures

Does a Sermon Really Change Anybody? « Preaching Barefoot

Gospel-Centered Preaching : Kingdom People

How to Think of Sermon Preparation and Delivery Like a Three-Course Meal – Justin Taylor

Feeding on Christ » Blog Archive » The Imperative of the Indicative: Preaching Christ from the Gospels

How Expositional Preaching Protects Preachers

On Sermon Application

Preaching with Bold Assurance: An Interview with Hershael York : Kingdom People

An Outline for a Process of Sermon Preparation – Justin Taylor

Filtered Listening, 2: Source – Pure Church by Thabiti Anyabwile

Filtered Listening: True or False – Pure Church by Thabiti Anyabwile

10 Foolish Obstacles to the Foolishness of Preaching

Feb 12, 2013 • By David Murray • 7 Comments

God chose the foolishness of Gospel preaching to save them that believe (1 Cor. 1:21). The Gospel message is foolishness to the world. But so is the Gospel medium – preaching. Who in their right mind would choose a regular 30-45 minute monologue from one sinful man to many sinful hearers to communicate the most important message in the world?

God would and did.

And he did it knowing that this method of communication would upset many people and cause them to find many foolish reasons for not listening. Some of the foolish obstacles I’ve come across (in myself and others) are:

1. Patchy grammar: Thankfully most people’s English education was as bad as mine and don’t notice too many of my grammatical faux pas, but there are always a few Grammar Girls (and boys) in every congregation. One misplaced preposition and down come the shutters.

2. Boring voice: Drone, groan, mumble, stumble, yawn. Is he trying to send us to sleep? Yet even the most attractive and varied voices eventually sound “meh” to regular hearers. Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a different voice every week?

3. Pastoral mistakes: Sometimes we can make a blunder in a personal relationship, an email communication, or at a social occasion which prejudices a hearer’s mind against us for a long time or even forever. We could be preaching the best truth in the best way but we’re still the worst preacher they’ve ever heard because we stood on their toes somewhere along the line.

4. Text choices: Why does the preacher never pick my favorite texts? Why does he never preach from my favorite book? Why does he always preach from such simple texts? Why does he always preach from such difficult texts? I’m not going to listen until he preaches on…

5. Preaching style: There are probably hundreds of preaching styles: fast, slow, loud, quiet, teachy, preachy, passionate, reasonable, sad, happy, smooth, jerky, etc. We all have our peculiar preferences and rarely do we find such a peculiar preacher.

6. Pulpit mannerisms: Why does he keep fiddling with his glasses? Does he think spinning his wedding ring will help spin this terrible sermon? Why doesn’t he look at us? Why does he keep staring at us? Has he only got one arm? Hands in his pockets again! Why does he grip the pulpit – is he about to faint or something? I wish he’d quit sniffing/coughing/frowning/grinning…

7. Verbal ticks: How many times did he say “in other words” today? Or “as I was saying” or “literally” or  ”finally.”

8. Christian Cliches: Can he not find another way of saying that? Does he have to use the same phraseology as every other time he preached on this? He says that in every sermon. Where’s his imagination?

9. Too young/old: Yes, before the preacher even opens his mouth, the old people might close him down because he’s so young, or the young people might tune him out because he’s too old.

10. Personality clash: I just don’t like him. He rubs me up the wrong way. He’s too cocky. He’s too defensive. He’s too apologetic. He’s too aggressive, etc.

It’s amazing what obstacles preachers have to overcome.  One slip-up in any of these areas and some people won’t give a minute of attention to the sermon that took you 10-15 hours to prepare. Although we pray every time we preach, that God would prevent anything we say or do getting in the way of the message, yet it will inevitably happen. It’s amazing anyone at all gets saved.

Why did God choose this method? Why not send a perfect angel with a perfect message delivered in a perfect manner? Wouldn’t that have been wiser? More effective?

God chose this method to demonstrate that the Gospel, not the preacher or his preaching, is the power of God unto salvation. He chose one of the most foolish methods and some of the most foolish creatures to reach multitudes of foolish sinners with a “foolish” message. And he did it this way in order to magnify His wisdom and power (1 Cor. 1:22-31).

We get grace. He gets glory.

7 Ways to Choose a Sermon Text

Jan 21, 2013 • By David Murray • 2 Comments

Email and RSS readers click here to view video. Previous Videos in the How Sermons Work Series:

1. Text or Topic?
2. Why choose a text?
3. What is a text?
4. The pros and cons of consecutive expository preaching

Pros and Cons of Consecutive Expository Preaching

Jan 14, 2013 • By David Murray • 8 Comments

Email and RSS readers click here to view video. Previous Videos in the How Sermons Work Series:

1. Text or Topic?
2.  Why choose a text?
3. What is a text?

How Sermons Work: What is a Text?

Jan 4, 2013 • By David Murray • 0 Comments

Email and RSS readers click here to view video. Previous Videos in the How Sermons Work Series:

1. Text or Topic?
2.  Why choose a text?

 

The magnificent tyranny of the Gospel

Dec 27, 2012 • By David Murray • 7 Comments

Seven reasons for preaching from a text rather than a topic:

  1. Scriptural precedent
  2. Honors the Bible
  3. Distinguishes the sermon
  4. Tethers preacher
  5. Easily remembered
  6. Variety
  7. Sets limits

Email and RSS subscribers may need to click here to view the video.

Faithful Sermon Preparation in a Busy Ministry (3)

Nov 19, 2012 • By David Murray • 1 Comment

Last week we proposed four ways to continue faithful sermon preparation in a busy ministry (Part One and Part Two). Today we’ll look at how regular routine and a pragmatic use of biblical languages will help us achieve what seems to be impossible at times.

Faithful sermon preparation in a busy ministry…

5. Follows a regular PATTERN

How Sermons Work is not the most devotional or heart-warming book on preaching – there are lots of those around; it’s more like a mechanical instruction manual that guides the reader through the sermon preparation process step by step, taking nothing for granted. There are lots of checklists and practical guides.

My aim is that as the preacher gets used to the exegetical pattern I set out, he will no longer need the book. It will become second nature to him, part of his mindset, a way of thinking that is automatic and instinctive.

Each time I went up a level at Tae Kwon Do, I used to think, my legs or arms will never manage that. It felt so awkward and unnatural even when done at 1 mph. However, after we repeated the movement a thousand times – and believe me it was at least a thousand times – it felt so normal and even boringly easy. The brain and muscle tissue had learned the pathways and patterns and it became second nature, even instinctive.

Similarly when we get into a sermon preparation pattern, the moment we settle into our office chair, the brain knows it’s time to start whirring, and knows what to whir and when.

The more routine we build into our sermon preparation, the more routine it will become. There is a supernatural element to it, of course, but there’s a lot of routine as well, basic mechanics, which if we learn and practice, the brain gets into the usual groove, allowing more space and opportunity for the supernatural as well.

I’m not saying that the How Sermons Work routine is the best for everyone, but I do believe everyone should have a basic pattern of reading text, translating, word studies, structure/outline, exegesis, commentaries, illustration, application, into, outro, etc.

6. Is PRAGMATIC in the use of biblical languages

I teach Hebrew exegesis. I want preachers to use Hebrew in their sermon preparation. However, I also want to be realistic.

When I started in the ministry I used to spend hours parsing verbs, looking up lexicons, etc., for 10 or more verses. I ended up with lots of lovely pages of Hebrew study, but not a sermon.

I’ve therefore adopted a method which I believe still places great importance on the study of God’s Word in the original languages, while at the same time increasing my time-efficiency.

So, I am very much against abandoning Greek and Hebrew. However, I am for re-positioning them, especially in the early days of our ministries, as we grow in knowledge and ability. I would not want any of us to kill our ministries or ourselves by trying to be a Lambdin or a Wenham while trying to preach three sermons to lost souls every week. If we try to persist in this we will soon give up on the original languages altogether – as many, sadly, have done.

My more realistic approach to the original languages has five components:

  • I read the text in various English versions first of all, to familiarize myself with the various translation options and differences.
  • I limit my original languages study to the 2-3 main verses. If I’m preaching OT narrative or a NT parable, I try to identify the few key verses and focus my study on them.
  • I study the Greek or Hebrew text, parsing and translating, with a particular focus on what my study of the text in the English versions highlighted. For example, if 4-5 mainstream translations agree on 90% of the text but differ on 10%, then I focus on the 10%. I don’t see the point in reinventing the wheel.
  • I make use of the many electronic helps to parse and translate my text. My preference is for Logos Bible Software.
  • I try to get time throughout the sermon preparation process to meditate on the text in the Greek or Hebrew. Apart from the subconscious and spiritual effects, such meditation will often yield thoughts and ideas which may not have been suggested by studying only English translations. God honors and rewards study of His Word as He originally gave it.

This is not the ideal, but almost everyone I know who has tried to reach for the ideal has fallen far short, got discouraged, and has given up all language study.

I prefer a more realistic approach that will maintain contact with the original languages, and will, over time, actually increase skill in them in a way that the “ideal” approach rarely will.

Tomorrow we’ll look at the last two strategies for faithful preparation of sermons in a busy ministry.

Faithful Sermon Preparation in Busy Ministry (2)

Nov 16, 2012 • By David Murray • 4 Comments

Yesterday we proposed two ways of combining faithful sermon preparation with a busy ministry. Today we’ll look at how prioritizing sermon preparation and planning ahead also help that happy union. 

Faithful sermon preparation in a busy ministry…

3. PRIORITIZES sermon preparation

An old minister who was also a shepherd told me when I entered the ministry, “Feed the sheep and you won’t hear them bleating.” So true! I’ve seen extremely promising ministries ruined because the pastor did everything but feed the sheep. It doesn’t matter how many people you visit, how much you evangelize, how popular you are with the young folks, if you don’t feed the sheep, they are going to start bleating.

The opposite is true too; a church can get through many problems and troubles if the sheep are kept full and satisfied.

We must prioritize sermon preparation. If we do nothing else well, we have to do this well. If we do nothing else in a week, we must do this. Nothing must get in the way of sermon prep time. OK, we won’t have the ideal schedules we all thought we would have in Seminary, but we must still schedule our week to make sure that we have our sermons ready for our sheep.

  • They should be scheduled times. As fixed as a doctor’s appointment. Everything else is worked around sermon prep.
  • They should be regular times – in the same place in our calendars each week – so that our brain is in the groove and knows what to expect when the starting blocks appear.
  • They should be large sections of time – a minimum of 3 hours at a time.
  • They should be the best times in our week – our high performance times.
  • They should be uninterrupted times – we tell our families and our elders, maybe even our congregation, that these times are virtually sacrosanct. We get our phone on voicemail and shut off all digital distractions.

Faithful sermon preparation will never happen without faithful time management. It will amaze you how much you can get done in regular, concentrated times of study.

4. PLANS ahead

I rarely preached series of consecutive expository sermons. Maybe two in my whole ministry. I much preferred to preach texts that caught my attention or that met a particular pressing need at the time. However, that didn’t mean that I sat down on Friday or Saturday and started looking for a text. No, I was looking all through the week, looking for a text that struck me in my own reading, family worship, in visiting a home, in my reading of Christian books, or something that spoke to a local or national issue. Sometimes I would gather 10 or more texts like that in the course of the week and I’d only need three. Some of the others would be used in later weeks and some never became sermons at all.

My point is, I was planning ahead and not just waiting until the moment I needed to start writing a sermon. I wouldn’t just write down a text though; I would often write down my initial thoughts or even a skeleton outline. Often I came to prepare a sermon and nothing had really impacted me that week. But I had dozens and dozens of previous texts, thoughts, and outlines stored up that I often plundered.

You probably are not quite so free-spirited as I was and am. Most American pastors are preaching at least one series of consecutive expository sermons. In some cases two or three at the same time. I’m sure many of you plan ahead your series, even months in advance. That will certainly help you save time with weekly text selection. But you can also be planning a bit more by reading ahead, studying difficult passages before they drown you the week you have to preach them.

One of the best pieces of advice I ever had was from an older pastor who told me to preserve the fruits of your study. I’ve used various systems to build up a database of information on various theological issues and subjects so that when I come to preach on a text that touches on say fellowship, or adoption, or the atonement, I already have a list of articles, quotations, etc., that I can quickly access without searching theological tomes for them. Although the cataloguing takes time, it saves so much time in sermon prep.

As much of my reading is done online now, I use Diigo.com to bookmark Internet articles with keywords and highlighted phrases.

Next time we’ll look at establishing exegetical routines and at a pragmatic use of biblical languages.

Faithful Sermon Preparation in a Busy Ministry

Nov 15, 2012 • By David Murray • 11 Comments

“Faithful sermon preparation” and “busy ministry” do not easily fit together. Often one has to be sacrificed – either I give up faithful sermon preparation or I give up busy ministry – and it’s usually “faithful sermon preparation” that gets the bullet.

So how do we try to hold these two opposing forces together? Faithful sermon preparation in a busy ministry…

1. Is PAINFULLY realistic

I well remember my first idyllic week or two of pastoral ministry. I had my color coded timetable, with 2-3 hours every day devoted to general theological  study, daily time in Greek and Hebrew, and a reading scheme encompassing eading a wide range of old and modern theological books. Then there were these beautiful long red sections called “sermon preparation” totaling maybe 15 hours per sermon.

Then ministry started happening. The phone calls began, the visits that took twice as long as expected, the inconvenient deaths, the visits to the local hospital (90 mins away in my part of the Scottish Highlands), Presbyteries, committees, problems in neighboring churches, and then wider denominational issues that would eventually result in our church being split after years of acrimonious controversy. Add on two children in 2 years, a new church building project, etc., and my beautifully crafted schedule was quickly forgotten. I think I observed it for about two weeks.

One of the most amusing exercises that I have my students do is draft a weekly schedule of what they think their week will look like in the ministry. They usually look very like my own ideal. Sometimes 30 hours of sermon prep, nil family time, and no day off. They look at me with incredulity when I start dismantling their beautiful plans with some good old-fashioned Scottish realism.

I once heard a famous American author and preacher say that no sermon should be preached that had less than 35 hours invested in it and it should be practiced 6-8 times before preaching! Multiple pastors’ heads slumped as he floated high above us in his own celebrity unreality.

Back in the real world, if we get to spend 10 hours on each sermon we are doing well. It’s probably going to be nearer 7-8 hours and in some cases 4-5 hours, especially if we have to prepare 3 sermons or more a week (as it was in my first pastorate, with four every second week). Remember not all sermons are equal. Doctrinal sermons or difficult passages will require much more preparation than a more devotional treatment of a Psalm. We need to be realistic.

It’s painful to accept this and work within these limitations. But if we don’t, we will eventually suffer pain in other ways.

I know of one pastor who only survived a few years in the ministry because he was trying to prepare every single sermon exactly as he had been taught in Seminary – following every single exegetical and homiletical step every single time. Eventually, the pressure he put himself under was so great that he dreaded sermon preparation, and found it impossible to preach any sermon that was less than perfectly prepared. Within a couple of years he was off work with stress and depression, and within another year he had left the ministry.

2. Requires PERSONAL preparation

Having said all that, I do want to encourage you to think of preparing sermons in a much broader way than the specific hours spent with the text and the commentaries. If that is the only sermon preparation we do, then our sermons will suffer, and so will our hearers.

We should regard our whole week as sermon preparation, because a large part of sermon preparation is personal preparation, preparing ourselves as well as preparing our sermons.

Our personal and family devotions are part of sermon preparation. They bring us into contact with God, His Word and His Spirit. They are not way over here on left field with sermon prep being over there on right field. No, they are on the same team, interplaying with one another.

Cultivate a meditative spirit as part of sermon preparation. Take your text with you as you drive; think on it as you go to sleep, as you shower. It’s amazing how much light we can get on our text away from the computer.

A holy life is also part of sermon preparation. Holiness is the greatest key to understanding the Bible. There is only so much that academic study can give us. Jesus said, “If anyone wills to do His will, he shall know concerning the doctrine, whether it is from God or whether I speak on My own authority” (Jn. 7:17). “He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him” (Jn. 14:21). God hides truth from the wise and prudent and reveals it to babes (Matt. 11:25). If we live a holy life, God will open up His Word to us in a way that no amount of hours ever will. There are computer sermons and there are communion sermons.

Tomorrow we will continue this series on Faithful Sermon Preparation in a Busy Ministry by looking at (3) Prioritizing sermon preparation and (4) Planning ahead.

Disarming your hearers

Nov 13, 2012 • By David Murray • 2 Comments

Although this article is about helping business speakers improve the effectiveness of their presentations, there’s much that’s helpful for preachers and Bible teachers too.

Nancy Duarte’s basic point is that a presentation’s purpose is to change people. However, as people are usually resistant to change you need to devise strategies to disarm their objections and overcome their obstacles to change. Anticipating such resistance will sharpen the presentation and improve its chances of accomplishing its goal. It also conveys to the audience that you’ve thought about them, not just yourself and your presentation, making them more open to your call to action.

She encourages presenters to think about three common types of resistance:

1. Logical resistance: As you plan your presentation, try to come up with arguments against your perspective. Familiarize yourself with alternate lines of reasoning by digging up articles, blog posts, and reports that challenge your stance.

2. Emotional resistance:
 Does your audience hold fast to a bias, dogma, or moral code — and do your ideas violate that in some way? Hitting raw nerves will set people off. So look at things from their perspective, and proceed carefully.

3. Practical resistance: Is it physically or geographically difficult for the audience to do what you’re asking? Acknowledge any sacrifices they’re making, and show that you’re shouldering some of the burden yourself.

Anticipating resistance forces you to really think about the people you’re presenting to, and that makes it easier to influence them. If you’ve made a sincere effort to look at the world through their eyes, it will show when you speak. You’ll feel more warmly toward them, so you’ll take on a conversational tone. You’ll sound — and be — authentic when you address their concerns. As a result, you’ll disarm them, and they’ll be more likely to accept your message.

You’d think Nancy was a homiletics teacher!

Disarm your audience when you present by Nancy Duarte.

What does an evangelistic sermon look like?

Nov 5, 2012 • By David Murray • 3 Comments

As regular readers will know, I’ve got a bit of a thing about evangelistic preaching, especially its relative rarity in the USA – at least compared to Scotland.

In that first post, I defined evangelistic preaching: “It expounds God’s Word (it is expository) with the primary aim of the salvation of lost souls (rather than primarily the instruction of God’s people). Obviously there’s a difference in content when a sermon is aimed at the unsaved more than the Christian. But there’s also a difference in the tone, in the pathos. An evangelistic sermon has a more urgent, pleading, persuading, and personal feel to it.

As many have asked me for an example, here’s a (far from perfect) attempt I made on Sunday evening. My fuller notes are here, my one-page summary notes are here, and the audio and video are here. Because I don’t use my notes in preaching, there are usually some differences between what I prepared and what I end up saying. Some of that is intentional, and some of it is plain forgetfulness!

My text was  the second part of John 10v10: “The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.” My points were:

  1. Jesus gives abundant spiritual life
  2. Jesus gives abundant intellectual life
  3. Jesus gives abundant emotional life
  4. Jesus gives abundant social life
  5. Jesus gives abundant physical life
  6. Jesus gives abundant eternal life

One caveat, the church has the unusual tradition of stopping the sermon about two thirds of the way through to sing a Psalter, after which the pastor preaches his last point. I’m told that you eventually get used to it.

Truthful + Beautiful = Faithful

Sep 10, 2012 • By David Murray • 1 Comment

If I wanted you to visit Scotland, I might send you to Scotland’s entry on Wikipedia, where you would find a few thousand words on Scotland’s history, geography, economy, monuments, landmarks, etc.: lots of facts, lots of information, lots of arguments and reasons for why you should cross the pond and visit the old country.

Or I could send you to Flickr or YouTube and encourage you to search for Scottish pictures and videos.

Scotland

Which do you think would be more successful?

The Wikipedia entry might make you say something like, “Well, that’s very interesting! Sounds like a great place. I think I’d like to go there someday.”

But the Flickr pictures and YouTube videos would evoke, “Wow, that’s beautiful. How do I get there and when can I go?”

Beauty is a more powerful persuader than data.

That’s Beautiful!
When the grocery store wants you to buy a new chocolate cake, what do they do? Do they set up a booth with a Powerpoint of the Nutrition Facts? Do they have books explaining the benefits of this low-carb, low-fat, low-sugar, high-protein, high-fiber chocolate cake?

Of course not, they set up tasting booths in aisles where the rich chocolate fragrance draws the nose, the light moist sponge draws the eyes, and the offered sample draws a drooling tongue. You taste and exclaim. “That’s beautiful! Where do I buy?”

Beauty attracts. Beauty draws. Beauty persuades. Beauty compels. Beauty convinces.

Yet, the church, especially the reformed branch of it, is not very good at beauty.

We do logical but not beautiful. We’re good at arguing, but not at attracting.  We’re good at systematizing but not at stunning. We’re good at organizing but not at awing. We’re good at clarity but not at beauty.

He’s Beautiful
Now, of course, we need logic, we need argument, we need system, we need organizing, and we need to be clear. But these are only servants to beauty, a means to an end – that of bringing people to the feet of Jesus exclaiming, “Wow! He’s beautiful!”

Facts, argument, logic, persuasion may bring you to nod your head in agreement.

Beauty produces, “Draw me, I will run after you!”

Truthful + Beautiful
When I’ve preached justification or sanctification, doctrine or devotion, Old Testament or New Testament, I ask not only, “Was it truthful?” but also, “Was Jesus beautiful?”

I don’t want my hearers just to say, “Well that was reasonable, logical, tightly argued, clear, etc.” I want them to say, “Jesus is so, so beautiful.”

Same goes for parenting. Amidst the noise, smoke, and dust of raising children, am I communicating the breathtaking, inimitable, irresistible, beauty of Christ?

Also for witnessing. I can proof text, win arguments, and beat down atheists, Arminians, Muslims and Mormons all day. But did I once try to show them the beauty of Jesus?

Beautiful inspiration
This post was partly inspired by Brian Zahnd’s Beauty will save the world: Rediscovering the allure and mystery of Christianity. Like Trevin Wax, I have some reservations about this book, especially the lack of clarity in a couple of places about the exclusive truth claims of Christianity. But the fundamental core message of the book is one that many of us in Calvinist churches (old and new) need to hear.

For too long we’ve limited the demand of faithfulness to “telling the truth.” To this we must also add “showing His beauty.”

Truthful + beautiful = faithful.

How to astonish the world

Aug 31, 2012 • By David Murray • 1 Comment

The world is not easily astonished or amazed. Human beings have accomplished and achieved so much that even a mission to Mars is so, “Whatever.” The latest films resort to more and more outlandish plots and extreme effects to grab and grip attention. The tsunami of digital media has hyper-stimulated us into numbness.

However, travel back with me 2000 years to Galilee and you’ll discover something that astonished, something that amazed, something that grabbed and gripped public attention. And it can do the same today. What is it?

Click on over to the Ligonier blog for my surprising answer.

Four (more) characteristics of Evangelistic Preaching

Jul 12, 2012 • By David Murray • 4 Comments

Further to yesterday’s post listing the first four characteristics of evangelistic preaching, here are the remaining four marks.

Plain
Evangelistic preaching will be plain. If we love sinners and we are anxious for them to be saved, we will be clear and plain in our structure, content, and choice of words. If we can use a smaller word, we use it. If we can shorten our sentences, we do so. If we can find an illustration, we tell it. Everything is aimed at simplicity and clarity, so that, as it was said of Martin Luther, it may be said of us, “It’s impossible to misunderstand him.”

And this is exhausting work. People may think at times that doctrinal sermons are harder to prepare and preach than evangelistic sermons. Not if you are really going to edit and trim and modify until your message communicates the profoundest truth in the simplest way possible. That involves real labor, sweat, toil and tears. In Preaching and Preachers Martyn Lloyd-Jones wrote:

If I am asked which sermons I wrote, I have already said that I used to divide my ministry, as I still do, into edification of the saints in the morning and a more evangelistic sermon in the evening. Well, my practice was to write my evangelistic sermon. I did so because I felt that in speaking to the saints, to the believers, one could feel more relaxed. There, one was speaking in the realm of the family. In other words, I believe that one should be unusually careful in evangelistic sermons. That is why the idea that a fellow who is merely gifted with a certain amount of glibness of speech and self-confidence, not to say cheek, can make an evangelist is all wrong. The greatest men should always be the evangelists, and generally have been; and the idea that Tom, Dick and Harry can be put up to speak on a street corner, but you must have a great preacher in a pulpit in a church is, to me, the reversing of the right order. It is when addressing the unbelieving world that we need to be most careful; and therefore I used to write my evangelistic sermon and not the other (pp. 215-16).

Powerful
When we go into the pulpit with an evangelistic sermon, let’s not go in defensively, and apologetically. Yes, it may be an “apologetic” sermon, but we are not apologizing for the truth. When we go in front of sinners with the gospel, let’s not come across as if we have something to hide or be afraid of. Let’s not hedge and qualify. Let’s not “discuss” or ”share.” Let’s preach with powerful, bold, divine authority. People need to hear, “Thus says the Lord.” This isn’t an option, this isn’t just another idea; this is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Persevering
And let our evangelistic sermons also be characterized by perseverance. We preach. No one’s converted. We do it again. We preach. No one’s converted. We do it again, and again, and again.

How often should you preach an evangelistic sermon? That will largely depend on context. In Scotland, I was expected to preach one evangelistic sermon and one teaching sermon every Sunday. Once a week is probably too much if you and your church are not used to this. But how about once a month? And you can tell your congregation that on such a morning/evening this is going to be a sermon for the unconverted, so that Christians will think, “I can take my friends to this. This is something I know my boss could listen to with some understanding.” Make it regular, and make it known that this is what you are going to be doing.

Prayerful
Above all, of course, evangelistic preaching is to be prayerful – before, during, and after. Pray to be delivered from the fear of man. Pray that God would give you a passion for souls. Pray that you would be able to communicate naturally and easily and freely. Pray that you’d get a hearing for the gospel and that you’d be able to present Christ so that you ”disappear.” And pray afterward that the seed sown would bring forth a harvest of saved souls, and that the church will be revived and built up.

“And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever (Dan. 12:3).

4 Characteristics of Evangelistic Preaching

Jul 11, 2012 • By David Murray • 1 Comment

We’ve looked at a definition of evangelistic preaching, some examples of it, and some reasons for its present rarity. Let’s move on now to the question, “What does evangelistic preaching sound/look/feel like?” We’ll look at four characteristics today, and four more tomorrow.

Present
Evangelistic preaching majors in the present tense. Yes, it deals with biblical data, which is usually in the past tense. But it moves rapidly from the past to the present. These are not sermons that are taken up with large amounts of history, geography and chronology. They may begin there, but move swiftly to the here and the now.

Hearers realize the sermon is about here, about now. It’s connected to the present, it’s relevant, it has impact on them, here and now, in this day and in this age. Martin Lloyd-Jones used to speak of such sermons being in the “urgent tense,” and that really is what should be communicated. We must show that the ancient Word connects with today’s world, and is relevant both to the present and the future.

Personal
These sermons should also be personal. Yes, again, we begin with explaining the Word as originally given to the Israelites, the disciples, etc. It starts with “they” and “them.” However, in evangelistic preaching, we move rapidly to “you.”

I’m sure we’ve all sat in congregations, heard sermons about the Philistines, the Israelites, the Corinthians and the Philippians, and wondered, “But what about me? Does this have anything to say to Americans, Scots, Africans, etc?” When teaching God’s people we can spend longer explaining the teaching as it applied to the original hearers. But when we are going after lost souls, we have to move more swiftly, we have to engage more rapidly, we have to show relevance much earlier on.

Also, when we are addressing the unconverted in front of us, we should work especially hard at moving away from reading our notes. When we are appealing, beseeching, arguing and reasoning in a very personal way with unbelievers – let it be eyeball to eyeball, “we beseech you.” Don’t let paper get in the way, distracting, and breaking the eye contact. Let’s really make it personal so that people really grasp “he is speaking to me.”

We can also make it personal by getting inside the minds of our hearers and saying things like this: “Well, you’re sitting there are you are thinking this…aren’t you? But this is what God’s word says.” Or, “You’re here today and you’re hearing this and you are feeling so and so….” And the person sitting there says, “He is thinking about me. He knows how I think, he knows how I tick; he is concerned to address what is going on in my mind.” Again, it just makes it a very personal intimate transaction.

Persuasive
In evangelistic preaching the great aim is persuasion. Much of such sermons will be taken up with Acts2v38-42 type beseeching, pleading, arguing, and reasoning. It’s not just, ”Here’s some facts; take them or leave them,” as if we are just dispassionate conveyors of information. We are here to persuade. People must see our anxiety that they respond to the Gospel in faith and repentance.

Passionate
To be really persuasive, we must also be passionate. Let people see that we feel this deeply, that we fear for their eternal state, that we are anxious over them, and that we love them deeply. Let that be communicated in our words, but also in our facial expressions, our body language, and our tone.

I’m not arguing for acting here; this should come naturally. Sometimes, before preaching an evangelistic sermon, I spend some time trying to think of lost unbelieving souls in my congregation, and even of particular individuals. I may try to see their faces (often lovely characters by nature – helpful, kind, loving people – but lost). I try to see them dying, going to judgment, and then their faces as they hear the verdict. Then I envision them sinking into the bottomless pit, being burned in eternal fire, going to the company of the devil and his angels. I try to see them there, try to hear them there. Sometimes I might even think of one of my own unsaved family members, just to try and bring home the reality and the enormity of the unsaved’s predicament. If we can really feel it ourselves, we will be passionate in our pleading, in our loving, and in our reasoning.

Why is evangelistic preaching so rare today?

Jul 10, 2012 • By David Murray • 17 Comments

The great expository preacher, Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, made sure that at least one sermon every Sunday was directed primarily to the unsaved in his congregation. That was also the practice in the Scottish Presbyterian churches I grew up in and pastored for 12 years. But most reformed churches have no such distinction today. Both morning and evening sermons tend to be primarily teaching sermons for God’s people.

Having defined evangelistic preaching and looked at various examples of it, I’d like to suggest some reasons for the rarity of evangelistic preaching today, especially in reformed churches.

The Preacher
We start by pointing a finger at ourselves. Many of us have to admit that we much prefer to be teachers than pleaders. It is easier to engage in explanation than application. It is more socially acceptable, it is more dignified and respectable to be engaged in calm reasoning and deduction, rather than in anxious weeping and beseeching. I think we’d all have to admit that it is easier emotionally and socially to be teachers than evangelists. And that prejudice, that bias, influences our choice of text and the way we preach our texts.

In addition to our prejudice, there is also our pragmatism. Let’s get people in first. Get them used to our church. Then we will become more “evangelistic.” After all we don’t want to put them off by telling them they are sinners who need a Savior; or that they must abandon their own works and trust in Christ’s grace alone; or that without faith in Christ they will be punished forever in hell, etc. Surely it’s much wiser to begin more slowly, more carefully, more diplomatically; and then once they are in a while, we can begin to be a bit more confrontational and demanding. But then more new faces appear, and so the pragmatic cycle begins again.

Presumption also lurks in the background of many preachers’ minds. Some pastors dangerously presume that their hearers are already saved. Assuming that all is well with their souls, they teach, instruct, and give guidance on how to live the Christian life; but they rarely preach for conversion.

The Congregation
When we preach evangelistic sermons, some mature Christians in our congregations, those we often lean on for our encouragement and strength, might feel (or even say), “Well there wasn’t much for me in that sermon…that’s more like milk for babies than meat for the mature.” Of course, many mature Christians love to hear evangelistic sermons. They enjoy being evangelized all over again, and they especially love to hear sermons addressed to their unconverted family and friends. However, others may not respond so appreciatively as they do to our epic sermons on Romans. That lack of response can impact what we preach and how we preach.

Also, we might not have many unconverted people in front of us. My first congregation had only 20-30 people. Sometimes there were maybe only 3-5 unconverted hearers in an evening service. It’s a lot harder to preach an evangelistic sermon in these circumstances, because everyone knows to whom you are directing your warning, wooing, and pleading words. Teaching messages are so much more comfortable than convicting messages – both to preach and to hear. That’s especially true if our few unconverted hearers are very “moral” or “churchy” people.

There may also be in our congregation those who might view evangelistic preaching with a suspicious eye and ear, especially if they come from a hyper-Calvinistic stream of Christian upbringing. Maybe others have come out of Arminian easybelievism, hyper-emotionalism, and decisionism, and react against any kind of emotional appeal to the unsaved. We don’t want to offend these people, we want to keep them on our side, and so again perhaps we hold back from regular, full-throated evangelistic preaching.

The World
We are not pluralistic. We believe, surely, in the exclusive claims of Christ. That’s what we swear to, sign up to, and state at our ordinations. But, we live in such a pluralistic, many-ways-to-God world, that it’s extremely difficult not to be influenced by that, even subconsciously.

Maybe, in the back of many pastors’ minds, the sharp edge of Gospel exclusivity has been blunted by worldly influence. They may not deny that Christ is the only way to heaven, and they may not preach many-ways-to-God. But they do not keep the believer/unbeliever distinction or the heaven/hell contrast constantly and vividly before their minds. And of course that’s going to affect their preaching – both its content and tone.

The real test of incipient pluralism is, “How do we really view the unconverted?” Is our first thought when we see them, “These precious souls are hell-bound, without Christ, lost, under the wrath of God, however religious they may be?” I’m deeply afraid that a kind of incipient, subtle, often unnoticed pluralism has blunted the sharp edge of evangelistic preaching.

The Devil

Then, of course, there is our great enemy, the devil. If there’s any kind of preaching that has been more successful in stealing captives from him and claiming them for the Lord, it is passionate evangelistic preaching. No weapon in the Gospel armory has been so effective in rescuing souls. Of course, he’s going to fight it, and he’s going to supply every excuse not to preach in an evangelistic way.

See also the insightful comments at the end of this post with further suggestions as to why evangelistic preaching is so infrequent today.

4 Kinds of Evangelistic Sermon

Jul 9, 2012 • By David Murray • 4 Comments

Every sermon text can be preached with an evangelistic application. But this isn’t “evangelistic preaching.” Remember our previous definition: “Evangelistic preaching is preaching that expounds God’s Word (it is expository) with the primary aim of the conversion of lost souls (rather than the instruction of God’s people).”

I was planning on following up that definition with some reasons for why such evangelistic preaching is so rare today. However, while reading through the great comments last week, I realized that there’s still some confusion about what an evangelistic sermon looks/sounds like. So, before returning to the “Why so rare?” question tomorrow, let me outline some examples of evangelistic sermon texts/topics, grouped into four categories.

“Warm-up” sermons
These are sermons we preach to clear and prepare the ground for the gospel. They address some of the common objections to Christianity, the caricatures of and prejudices against Christianity. Such “apologetic” sermons will set out to prove the truth and relevance of Christianity, and demonstrate its doctrinal and practical superiority. Examples:

  • Proofs of the resurrection
  • Evidence for creation v evolution
  • One way or many ways to God
  • Do only good people go to heaven?
  • Bible’s analysis of current economic, social, moral problems, etc.

These sermons are aiming at conversion, especially the early stages of conversion. They are clearing away all the rubbish that has accumulated in a sinner’s mind, to gain a hearing for the gospel. They deal with issues that will open the pathway for Christ and His grace. That’s why I call them “warm-up” sermons. We are taking sinners who are cold, prejudiced, and opposed to Christianity, and using God’s Word to break up the soil, warm the heart, and provide an opening for the core message of Christ and His grace.

Warning Sermons
Some warning sermons are characterized by a focus on the more threatening aspects of God’s character, especially His attributes of holiness, justice, sovereignty, and power. Other warning sermons may focus on human sinfulness, inability, frailty, and mortality. We may expound and apply the law, showing what God defines as sin and wickedness. We might deal with the speed of time, the uncertainty of life, the imminence of death, the certainty of judgment, the length of eternity, the reality of hell, etc. These are all warning sermons. They are designed to alarm the complacent, the comfortable, and the thoughtless; to make them anxious, and fearful, and even terrified. Examples:

  • Remember Lot’s wife – and Saul, and Judas
  • God’s law
  • The end-of-time parables
  • Revelation’s great white throne, bottomless pit, etc.
  • Ecclesiastes’ view of the best this world can offer, etc.
  • The Psalmist’s view of our frailty and mortality, etc.

The great aim of these sermons is to convict, to bring our hearers to an awareness of their perilous state before God, and their need of repentance.

Wooing Sermons
Having prepared the way for the Gospel with “warm-up” sermons, and having shown the need for the Gospel with warning sermons, we then come with a wooing word. We explain the wonders of the Father’s willingness to send his Son to sinners, and to save them by His suffering, death, and resurrection. We also focus on the Lord Jesus; His willingness to come, suffer and die for sinners; His tender, wise and winning ways with sinners. We explain the powerful work of the Holy Spirit in regenerating and renewing the hardest of hearts. We explain that God saves by grace through faith, not by merit through works. We are trying to address people who are trembling, who are fearful, who are scared, and are seeking to draw them in to the love and the mercy and the grace of God. No pastor can pluck the chord of grace enough. Examples:

  • The prodigal son
  • Christ’s tender dealings with sinners during his ministry
  • The sufferings of Christ on the cross
  • The atonement
  • Free justification
  • The Gospel invitations and commands
  • The sufficiency and suitability of Christ, etc.
  • Adoption

If the aim of the warm-up sermon is to demonstrate relevance, and if the aim of the warming sermon is to bring people to repentance, the aim of the wooing sermon is to bring people to rest in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Will Sermons
Every sermon is ultimately addressed to the will. Yes, we address the head; and through the head, we address the heart. But we don’t just want to give people facts and feelings. We want changed lives. That’s surely the aim of our preaching. Ultimately, then, every sermon is addressed to the will. But evangelistic sermons, and especially this fourth kind of evangelistic sermon, are addressed especially and repeatedly to the will.

These are sermons that bring people to the signpost at the junction, with two choices. These are sermons that bring people to the ballot box, where they must cast their vote. They bring people to that point where they are faced with the two great and ultimate options: faith or unbelief, life or death, heaven or hell. These are sermons that are full of persuasion, pleading, and arguing and beseeching. Examples:

  • Paul and Agrippa
  • Jesus and the woman of Samaria
  • Parable of the wedding invitation
  • Paul on Mars Hill
  • Peter at Pentecost
  • “Choose you this day whom you will serve”
  • Narrow/broad way
  • Revelation 22:17
  • Elijah on Mt Carmel
  • “Stretch out your hand”
  • “Lazarus, come forth”

But, is man not totally depraved? Are we not “dead in trespasses and sins?” Are we not spiritually “disabled?” Is the will not in bondage? Yes, yes, yes, and yes. There is no question the Bible teaches this. However, as the examples above show, the Bible also describes the depraved, dead, disabled and enslaved will being addressed. It may seem illogical to us, but God has chosen to free the will, enable the “disabled,” and give life to the “dead” by the persuasive preaching of the Gospel.

These sermons have content for head and heart, but are especially focused on pressurizing, yes pressurizing, the will. The truth is pressed home so closely that every hearer is “forced” to make a choice. The Puritans used to speak of the Gospel vice that squeezes hearers so tightly that they cannot but say “yes” or “no.”

From this range of sample evangelistic sermons, I hope you can see that this isn’t the kind of preaching that will sound repetitive. There is a great range and variety of evangelistic sermons. There is no need for us to sound the same every time we do this. The Word of God has provided us with so many models and so much material that we can preach evangelistically and freshly every time.

Any other kinds of evangelistic sermons that I’ve missed out?

Page 1 of 5
12345»