<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CK2:16 Ten Myths About Calvinism</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/#comment-2171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Adam. You raise some valid concerns. Maybe we can have Dr Stewart back again as there has certainly been some considerable follow-up on this podcast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adam. You raise some valid concerns. Maybe we can have Dr Stewart back again as there has certainly been some considerable follow-up on this podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kuehner</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Kuehner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/06/24/ck216-ten-myths-about-calvinism/#comment-2170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting the interview.  This book looks like it has some very helpful material to contribute.  Nevertheless, I had some hesitations about Dr. Stewart&#039;s vision.  His call for interdenominational Reformed &quot;unity&quot; seemed vague.  We all want unity, but I didn&#039;t hear any unique logistical suggestions.  The strength of 21st century Calvinism has been its grass roots dynamic.  To be sure, we must aim to promote a more consistently biblical ecclesiology, but Dr. Stewart gave the impression that there ought to be a formalized &quot;movement&quot; to appoint official spokesmen and manage public responses to issues like Rob Bell, etc.  Personally, I am not persuaded that the bulk of the Reformed response was as bloodthirsty as suggested.  Most of the reviews I read online anticipated this accusation and made every effort to avoid an aggressively negative tone.  Dr. Stewart&#039;s comments on the sabbath and on women in the church had me somewhat perplexed as well.  In sum, his vision of a broad-minded, more-tightly-managed Reformed tradition appears to supply more questions than it does answers.  Still, this book is a hot topic and I greatly appreciated the interview!  Keep up the good work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the interview.  This book looks like it has some very helpful material to contribute.  Nevertheless, I had some hesitations about Dr. Stewart&#8217;s vision.  His call for interdenominational Reformed &#8220;unity&#8221; seemed vague.  We all want unity, but I didn&#8217;t hear any unique logistical suggestions.  The strength of 21st century Calvinism has been its grass roots dynamic.  To be sure, we must aim to promote a more consistently biblical ecclesiology, but Dr. Stewart gave the impression that there ought to be a formalized &#8220;movement&#8221; to appoint official spokesmen and manage public responses to issues like Rob Bell, etc.  Personally, I am not persuaded that the bulk of the Reformed response was as bloodthirsty as suggested.  Most of the reviews I read online anticipated this accusation and made every effort to avoid an aggressively negative tone.  Dr. Stewart&#8217;s comments on the sabbath and on women in the church had me somewhat perplexed as well.  In sum, his vision of a broad-minded, more-tightly-managed Reformed tradition appears to supply more questions than it does answers.  Still, this book is a hot topic and I greatly appreciated the interview!  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
