<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meeting manners</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/08/10/meeting-manners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/08/10/meeting-manners/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Sarafolean</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/08/10/meeting-manners/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Sarafolean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/blog/2011/08/10/meeting-manners/#comment-2076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like a lot of this stuff would be solved if meetings were run via Roberts Rules of Order.  A meeting is called to resolve a matter or move a decision that needs to be made.  A motion is put forward; it is either seconded or dies for lack of a second. If seconded, then debate ensues with a vote being taken.  I realize that this only works in a situation where those who participate can vote (i.e. are equals).  I would not work in a corporate setting where a department head asks those under him/her for input.  Those situations parallel the congregational church setting where everyone gets to vote on every matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a lot of this stuff would be solved if meetings were run via Roberts Rules of Order.  A meeting is called to resolve a matter or move a decision that needs to be made.  A motion is put forward; it is either seconded or dies for lack of a second. If seconded, then debate ensues with a vote being taken.  I realize that this only works in a situation where those who participate can vote (i.e. are equals).  I would not work in a corporate setting where a department head asks those under him/her for input.  Those situations parallel the congregational church setting where everyone gets to vote on every matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
