<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the difference between typology and allegory?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/06/22/pocket-theology-1-whats-the-difference-between-typology-and-allegory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/06/22/pocket-theology-1-whats-the-difference-between-typology-and-allegory/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weekly Review &#124; jtcochran.com</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/06/22/pocket-theology-1-whats-the-difference-between-typology-and-allegory/#comment-6405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Weekly Review &#124; jtcochran.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=8342#comment-6405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 6/22 &#8211; Pocket Theology (1): What&#8217;s the difference between typology and allegory? by David Murray [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6/22 &#8211; Pocket Theology (1): What&#8217;s the difference between typology and allegory? by David Murray [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/06/22/pocket-theology-1-whats-the-difference-between-typology-and-allegory/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=8342#comment-6396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RC. I totally agree with you on the false choice between history or point. All biblical history is theological history; it all has a point, a redemptive point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RC. I totally agree with you on the false choice between history or point. All biblical history is theological history; it all has a point, a redemptive point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcjr</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/06/22/pocket-theology-1-whats-the-difference-between-typology-and-allegory/#comment-6384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rcjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=8342#comment-6384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks brother. Well done. Don&#039;t know how fitting this is, but have you ever noticed how so many Reformed folk seem to think a given text must either have a point, or must be history, but can&#039;t be both? Framework guys may indeed see poetic elements in the creation account, but why can&#039;t it still be historical? Can&#039;t God wrote three dimensional poems, and isn&#039;t that what a type is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks brother. Well done. Don&#8217;t know how fitting this is, but have you ever noticed how so many Reformed folk seem to think a given text must either have a point, or must be history, but can&#8217;t be both? Framework guys may indeed see poetic elements in the creation account, but why can&#8217;t it still be historical? Can&#8217;t God wrote three dimensional poems, and isn&#8217;t that what a type is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
