<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this the most sexist verse in the Bible?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Steve of Northern Lights</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/#comment-10097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St. Steve of Northern Lights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=10260#comment-10097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To follow up on the topic, our New Geneva study, references this verse to Job 33.23 
The reference of &quot;One among a thousand&quot; as the NKJ version has it. One could perhaps see a more pastoral association and Christlike reference given with the context of the Job passage. Any thoughts on this potential connection?

&quot;If there be for him an angel,
    a mediator, one of the thousand,

    to declare to man what is right for him,
24 and he is merciful to him, and says,
    ‘Deliver him from going down into the pit;
    I have found a ransom;
25 let his flesh become fresh with youth;
    let him return to the days of his youthful vigor’;
26 then man[c] prays to God, and he accepts him;
    he sees his face with a shout of joy&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on the topic, our New Geneva study, references this verse to Job 33.23<br />
The reference of &#8220;One among a thousand&#8221; as the NKJ version has it. One could perhaps see a more pastoral association and Christlike reference given with the context of the Job passage. Any thoughts on this potential connection?</p>
<p>&#8220;If there be for him an angel,<br />
    a mediator, one of the thousand,</p>
<p>    to declare to man what is right for him,<br />
24 and he is merciful to him, and says,<br />
    ‘Deliver him from going down into the pit;<br />
    I have found a ransom;<br />
25 let his flesh become fresh with youth;<br />
    let him return to the days of his youthful vigor’;<br />
26 then man[c] prays to God, and he accepts him;<br />
    he sees his face with a shout of joy&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Steve of Northern Lights</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/#comment-10096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[St. Steve of Northern Lights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=10260#comment-10096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Murray, Thanks for blogging on this verse. I think I remember reading in the book &quot;The Art of Prophecying&quot; by William Perkins, that this verse refers to the special calling Ministers have, and that a good minister is so very rare. And then, Christ being the only real minister, or &quot;upright&quot; man among them all. I think that the book is in the church library back in CA, and so I wasn&#039;t able to look it up, nor find any references for that passage of the book online. So maybe it was Perkins or another Puritan on preaching. But I had that same question for a long time as well! Would you agree with that take on the passage?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Murray, Thanks for blogging on this verse. I think I remember reading in the book &#8220;The Art of Prophecying&#8221; by William Perkins, that this verse refers to the special calling Ministers have, and that a good minister is so very rare. And then, Christ being the only real minister, or &#8220;upright&#8221; man among them all. I think that the book is in the church library back in CA, and so I wasn&#8217;t able to look it up, nor find any references for that passage of the book online. So maybe it was Perkins or another Puritan on preaching. But I had that same question for a long time as well! Would you agree with that take on the passage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Edwards</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/#comment-10088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Edwards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=10260#comment-10088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this. I have likewise found this to be a difficult verse.

I liked the look of this solution, so I fired up Bibleworks to check the Hebrew of Ecc 7:28. The Hebrew for find here is מצא, which is the standard word for &#039;find&#039;. 

So I wondered whether there was an element to the semantic range with which I was unfamiliar where it meant &quot;figured out&quot;. So to the lexica I went. There I find the sense of figured out, but the only references for that are in Judges 14, where the expression is &quot;find [the solution to] a riddle&quot;, so that is not necessarily applicable to other contexts.

BDB does suggest the meaning &quot;learn by study&quot; for the verses either side of this one - so I wondered whether that would fit. But really that is not so much a distinct meaning as the method for finding (hence the fact that most English versions continue to translate  with &quot;find&quot; (NET has &quot;discover&quot;, but that hardly seems to be materially different)).

So I think that I am left in the position of saying that that sounds like a neat solution, but is not really apparent in the text. Unless there is something that I am missing (as suggested by your comment that this &quot;fits the Hebrew ...&quot;); if so, please help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. I have likewise found this to be a difficult verse.</p>
<p>I liked the look of this solution, so I fired up Bibleworks to check the Hebrew of Ecc 7:28. The Hebrew for find here is מצא, which is the standard word for &#8216;find&#8217;. </p>
<p>So I wondered whether there was an element to the semantic range with which I was unfamiliar where it meant &#8220;figured out&#8221;. So to the lexica I went. There I find the sense of figured out, but the only references for that are in Judges 14, where the expression is &#8220;find [the solution to] a riddle&#8221;, so that is not necessarily applicable to other contexts.</p>
<p>BDB does suggest the meaning &#8220;learn by study&#8221; for the verses either side of this one &#8211; so I wondered whether that would fit. But really that is not so much a distinct meaning as the method for finding (hence the fact that most English versions continue to translate  with &#8220;find&#8221; (NET has &#8220;discover&#8221;, but that hardly seems to be materially different)).</p>
<p>So I think that I am left in the position of saying that that sounds like a neat solution, but is not really apparent in the text. Unless there is something that I am missing (as suggested by your comment that this &#8220;fits the Hebrew &#8230;&#8221;); if so, please help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Newbell</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/#comment-10077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.Newbell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=10260#comment-10077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this post. At first I kind of giggled and thought, even then men just couldn&#039;t figure us out. :) God is love. He loves women so much that he sacrificed himself for us. What amazing grace. His Word demonstrates that redeeming love throughout the whole of it. So thankful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. At first I kind of giggled and thought, even then men just couldn&#8217;t figure us out. <img src="https://headhearthand.org/eph24/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  God is love. He loves women so much that he sacrificed himself for us. What amazing grace. His Word demonstrates that redeeming love throughout the whole of it. So thankful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2012/10/30/is-this-the-most-sexist-verse-in-the-bible/#comment-10067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=10260#comment-10067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for explaining this verse. It&#039;s always annoyed me. I was reading Leviticus 12 this morning and came across the passage on purification after childbirth. I&#039;ve never understood why the mother&#039;s period of uncleaness after birth was twice as long for girls than for boys. I know the uncleaness is because of vaginal blood loss and not because of a girl or boy buy why the doubling? My study Bible wasn&#039;t very helpful. What do other commentators say on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for explaining this verse. It&#8217;s always annoyed me. I was reading Leviticus 12 this morning and came across the passage on purification after childbirth. I&#8217;ve never understood why the mother&#8217;s period of uncleaness after birth was twice as long for girls than for boys. I know the uncleaness is because of vaginal blood loss and not because of a girl or boy buy why the doubling? My study Bible wasn&#8217;t very helpful. What do other commentators say on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
