<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church Power Games</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/04/03/church-power-games/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/04/03/church-power-games/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neem en lees: 10 April 2013 &#124; Pro Regno</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/04/03/church-power-games/#comment-20509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neem en lees: 10 April 2013 &#124; Pro Regno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=12505#comment-20509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Church Power Games  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Church Power Games  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bailey</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/04/03/church-power-games/#comment-19779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Bailey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=12505#comment-19779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great exercise.  It is a great habit to closely consider the structure of our institutions. I do get a little lost when you bring in &quot;(abuse);personal agenda;sadly;and too long&quot; Based on the impartial tone of the first 9/10ths of the article &quot;administrative power&quot; should have been defined as -use of procedure and bureaucracy to ensure the well being of the institution.(or something like that) The final 10th of the piece implies something inherently faulty with authority or some presupposed disposition towards authority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great exercise.  It is a great habit to closely consider the structure of our institutions. I do get a little lost when you bring in &#8220;(abuse);personal agenda;sadly;and too long&#8221; Based on the impartial tone of the first 9/10ths of the article &#8220;administrative power&#8221; should have been defined as -use of procedure and bureaucracy to ensure the well being of the institution.(or something like that) The final 10th of the piece implies something inherently faulty with authority or some presupposed disposition towards authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
