<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worldview</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/12/04/worldview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/12/04/worldview/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/12/04/worldview/#comment-35483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=15690#comment-35483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with you 100% on the Amazon reviews.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you 100% on the Amazon reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Armstrnog</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/12/04/worldview/#comment-35321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Armstrnog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=15690#comment-35321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my, that article on banning negative reviews was positively dripping with sarcasm. That or I&#039;m just so used to it I assume everything is sarcastic. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, that article on banning negative reviews was positively dripping with sarcasm. That or I&#8217;m just so used to it I assume everything is sarcastic. <img src="https://headhearthand.org/eph24/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou G.</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2013/12/04/worldview/#comment-35319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=15690#comment-35319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously, the idea of banning all negative book reviews doesn&#039;t make sense, but it&#039;s also not all that surprising. The 20 something generation has one criteria for acceptance: possitivity. Anyone who thinks or analyzes the prevailing groupthink is the defacto outcast and object of (unspoken but assumed) scorn.
On the flip side, I do believe that places like Amazon who allow negative reviews should be more diligent in scanning those reviews. When I preview a book I&#039;m about to buy, I actually do look at the negative reviews and often there is some good insight or cautionary information there. But also, at times, those reviews can be completely unhelpful or irrelevant. 
In any case, I do see good points on both sides of the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the idea of banning all negative book reviews doesn&#8217;t make sense, but it&#8217;s also not all that surprising. The 20 something generation has one criteria for acceptance: possitivity. Anyone who thinks or analyzes the prevailing groupthink is the defacto outcast and object of (unspoken but assumed) scorn.<br />
On the flip side, I do believe that places like Amazon who allow negative reviews should be more diligent in scanning those reviews. When I preview a book I&#8217;m about to buy, I actually do look at the negative reviews and often there is some good insight or cautionary information there. But also, at times, those reviews can be completely unhelpful or irrelevant.<br />
In any case, I do see good points on both sides of the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
