<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Submission in Practice: 10 Steps</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2014/10/22/submission-in-practice-10-steps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2014/10/22/submission-in-practice-10-steps/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Tabs [10/23/14] &#8249; Millennial Evangelical</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2014/10/22/submission-in-practice-10-steps/#comment-46684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Tabs [10/23/14] &#8249; Millennial Evangelical]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=19524#comment-46684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Submission in Practice: 10 Steps—David Murray [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Submission in Practice: 10 Steps—David Murray [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2014/10/22/submission-in-practice-10-steps/#comment-46682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=19524#comment-46682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the whole, I think this is a good paradigm.  The one glaring omission, though, is the possibility in
 #6 that the wife actually convinces husband that he is wrong, and he is
 sufficiently humble to just admit it and adjust accordingly. Similarly, in #7, all the while he tries to convince her that he is right, she correspondingly tries to convince him that she is.  Ideally (and usually) that ought to eventually conclude in a unanimous decision of what they jointly think is best.  Generally speaking, if you get to #8 with any semblance of regularity, it means between the two of you, you&#039;re not good enough at #6 and #7.  

Your &quot;general points&quot; almost, but not quite, remedy this omission.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the whole, I think this is a good paradigm.  The one glaring omission, though, is the possibility in<br />
 #6 that the wife actually convinces husband that he is wrong, and he is<br />
 sufficiently humble to just admit it and adjust accordingly. Similarly, in #7, all the while he tries to convince her that he is right, she correspondingly tries to convince him that she is.  Ideally (and usually) that ought to eventually conclude in a unanimous decision of what they jointly think is best.  Generally speaking, if you get to #8 with any semblance of regularity, it means between the two of you, you&#8217;re not good enough at #6 and #7.  </p>
<p>Your &#8220;general points&#8221; almost, but not quite, remedy this omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
