As far as this mattering in this case–my point is that it doesn’t matter as far as a case for religious liberty. But I’m still hesitant to refer to her as a Christian martyr because I’m hesitant to refer to her as a Christian–since from what I’m seeing she is a modalist who denies the Trinity. But perhaps David has some information that I do not.

A member of the Canadian federal (national) parliament, who is seeking re-election, recently phoned to ask for my support in re-electing the current majority political party to another term in Canadian parliament. (They got both my vote and financial support in the past.)

In civil tones, I expressed my outrage at his majority political party’s refusal or indolence in addressing abortion as the silent slaughter of pre-borns in Canada.

His answer? “This is not the time.”

Yes it is. In the British tradition, we Candians say that religion is a private thing.

But murder clearly is not.

Thank you, thank you for your article, a compelling contrast of the temporising timidity of many politicians—and posturing Christian pundits—and the Godly gutsiness of Mrs Davis. May her tribe increase.

Whether one agrees with her political stance or not, to apply the term Martyr to Kim Davis is an insult to all Martyrs of The Gospels.