<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon M</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/#comment-49661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=24770#comment-49661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for clarifying!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for clarifying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/#comment-49659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=24770#comment-49659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Brandon, I&#039;m sorry if my article suggested that technology had no role in controlling technology. I&#039;m not so much arguing for less technology but more theology. I agree that there will be no shaming involved in the final judgment for believers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Brandon, I&#8217;m sorry if my article suggested that technology had no role in controlling technology. I&#8217;m not so much arguing for less technology but more theology. I agree that there will be no shaming involved in the final judgment for believers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon M</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/#comment-49617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=24770#comment-49617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Murray,

Thank you for your thought provoking post. I agree with your &quot;more theology&quot; premise. But would a faithful application of it require families to do away with all forms of accountability software? 

Lastly, and this is not to discredit the thrust of your article, but concerning the future judgment of believers, Rick Phillips has written persuasively that believers will not face one last final shaming for their sins on the Day of Judgement; rather, believers will only receive reward and praise and the unjust will be judged by their works.

Here&#039;s the link to the article (http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/five-arguments-against-future-justification-part/). If you can find the time at some point, I&#039;d be interested to hear your take on his position.

Blessings in Christ,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Murray,</p>
<p>Thank you for your thought provoking post. I agree with your &#8220;more theology&#8221; premise. But would a faithful application of it require families to do away with all forms of accountability software? </p>
<p>Lastly, and this is not to discredit the thrust of your article, but concerning the future judgment of believers, Rick Phillips has written persuasively that believers will not face one last final shaming for their sins on the Day of Judgement; rather, believers will only receive reward and praise and the unjust will be judged by their works.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link to the article (<a href="http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/five-arguments-against-future-justification-part/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/five-arguments-against-future-justification-part/</a>). If you can find the time at some point, I&#8217;d be interested to hear your take on his position.</p>
<p>Blessings in Christ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NUGGETS &#124; Counseling One Another</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2016/10/03/digital-theology/#comment-49615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NUGGETS &#124; Counseling One Another]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=24770#comment-49615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Digital Theology &#8211; The longer I’ve wrestled with this problem in my own family, the more convinced I’ve become that the ultimate answer is not “no technology” or “more technology” but “more theology.” [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Digital Theology &#8211; The longer I’ve wrestled with this problem in my own family, the more convinced I’ve become that the ultimate answer is not “no technology” or “more technology” but “more theology.” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
