<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch me call Pastor N. T. Grayshon to repentance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/</link>
	<description> Informing Minds. Moving Hearts. Directing Hands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Powell</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel Powell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the question is, &quot;Does technology lead to a shorter life?&quot; Then extra-biblical information is likely necessary. But if the question is, &quot;How can I honor the Lord with my use of technology?&quot; Then extra-biblical sources have nothing to say about that, unless they are commenting on Scripture.

Further, using the fear of death as a (the?) motivator to consider technology does not address heart and wisdom issues, and it puts self at the center instead of God.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the question is, &#8220;Does technology lead to a shorter life?&#8221; Then extra-biblical information is likely necessary. But if the question is, &#8220;How can I honor the Lord with my use of technology?&#8221; Then extra-biblical sources have nothing to say about that, unless they are commenting on Scripture.</p>
<p>Further, using the fear of death as a (the?) motivator to consider technology does not address heart and wisdom issues, and it puts self at the center instead of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beccaj rt</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beccaj rt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s interesting, right in the middle of deleting my account, Disqus, or someone, reposted my comment; that&#039;s a first in what can only be described as a history of censorship on Disqus. Oh and David, my comment is not an &quot;argument—Again, the blessed Words from the Holy Spirit in 2 Timothy 3:14-17, and from the Lord in Matthew 4:4, and throughout the Holy Bible, are clear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, right in the middle of deleting my account, Disqus, or someone, reposted my comment; that&#8217;s a first in what can only be described as a history of censorship on Disqus. Oh and David, my comment is not an &#8220;argument—Again, the blessed Words from the Holy Spirit in 2 Timothy 3:14-17, and from the Lord in Matthew 4:4, and throughout the Holy Bible, are clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just went in to Disqus and unspammed it for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went in to Disqus and unspammed it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Murray</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Murray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t delete it. So it must have been Disqus. I&#039;ll go into Disqus later as it&#039;s usually possible to restore comments that Disqus flags. It was sent to me by email and I saw nothing to fear from your argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t delete it. So it must have been Disqus. I&#8217;ll go into Disqus later as it&#8217;s usually possible to restore comments that Disqus flags. It was sent to me by email and I saw nothing to fear from your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beccaj rt</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beccaj rt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Murray, my comment was deleted with the claim, &quot;Detected as spam&quot;—was that by you or by Disqus? Don&#039;t answer that, it&#039;s a rhetorical question, the answer doesn&#039;t matter. The truth is my comment was not spam and nor was there anything in it to warrant deletion. I&#039;m now going to delete my Disqus account. Goodbye.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Murray, my comment was deleted with the claim, &#8220;Detected as spam&#8221;—was that by you or by Disqus? Don&#8217;t answer that, it&#8217;s a rhetorical question, the answer doesn&#8217;t matter. The truth is my comment was not spam and nor was there anything in it to warrant deletion. I&#8217;m now going to delete my Disqus account. Goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beccaj rt</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beccaj rt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blessed Words from the Holy Spirit in 2 Timothy 3:14-17, and from the Lord in Matthew 4:4, and throughout the Holy Bible, are clear. Sources of knowledge from outside of the Bible are not only not necessary for understanding, preaching, and applying the Bible; they sow, among other things, confusion which always entails fallacious reasoning. 

While more could be said, this, &quot;Science provided me not just with helpful facts but with necessary facts&quot;—is a statement (among others) that simply assumes what it&#039;s trying to prove, i.e., that &quot;science&quot; provides &quot;necessary facts&quot; and that &quot;science&quot; has &quot;necessary and authoritative&quot; truth. It also begs many questions, e.g., who determines what is “necessary facts” and what are not, and who said &quot;science&quot; has necessary and authoritative truth, and what &quot;science” are you talking about anyway? 

This issue reminds me of Charles Lyell, who sought to &quot;free the science from Moses&quot; so that the Church would accept his &quot;science&quot; i.e., his uniformitarian ideas. Ideas which the Word of God specifically through Moses contradict. Please don’t assume I&#039;m saying that is what you&#039;re doing; “But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ” 2 Corinthians 11:3.

Of course, none of those books mentioned God, that&#039;s the way of the world, it&#039;s been that way since the fall. The serpent enticed Eve to question what the Word of God really means as a means to an end; to forget God and His Word and rely instead on her own &quot;reasoning&quot; and the words (ideas) that came of it. She obviously told herself (based on the short book from the serpent) &quot;that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise&quot; and so forgetting God and His Word, &quot;she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate&quot; Genesis 3.

The world doesn&#039;t care about &quot;vital information&quot; and “necessary facts” it wants you to take your eyes off of God and turn your ears from His Word. Of course, that entails encouraging you to rely your own &quot;reasoning&quot; and the &quot;reasoning&quot; of secular scientists who say this &quot;_____&quot; (fill in the blank) today and that &quot;_____&quot; (fill in the blank) tomorrow. 

By the way, John Calvin’s claim, &quot;that truth from non-biblical sources was not just helpful, and not just necessary, but to neglect it is a sin&quot; is par for that course. The Holy Bible makes no such claim, so why would you need to repent?

&quot;One sweeping charge may be brought against the whole of Christendom, and that charge is neglect and abuse of the Bible.&quot; J.C. Ryle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blessed Words from the Holy Spirit in 2 Timothy 3:14-17, and from the Lord in Matthew 4:4, and throughout the Holy Bible, are clear. Sources of knowledge from outside of the Bible are not only not necessary for understanding, preaching, and applying the Bible; they sow, among other things, confusion which always entails fallacious reasoning. </p>
<p>While more could be said, this, &#8220;Science provided me not just with helpful facts but with necessary facts&#8221;—is a statement (among others) that simply assumes what it&#8217;s trying to prove, i.e., that &#8220;science&#8221; provides &#8220;necessary facts&#8221; and that &#8220;science&#8221; has &#8220;necessary and authoritative&#8221; truth. It also begs many questions, e.g., who determines what is “necessary facts” and what are not, and who said &#8220;science&#8221; has necessary and authoritative truth, and what &#8220;science” are you talking about anyway? </p>
<p>This issue reminds me of Charles Lyell, who sought to &#8220;free the science from Moses&#8221; so that the Church would accept his &#8220;science&#8221; i.e., his uniformitarian ideas. Ideas which the Word of God specifically through Moses contradict. Please don’t assume I&#8217;m saying that is what you&#8217;re doing; “But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ” 2 Corinthians 11:3.</p>
<p>Of course, none of those books mentioned God, that&#8217;s the way of the world, it&#8217;s been that way since the fall. The serpent enticed Eve to question what the Word of God really means as a means to an end; to forget God and His Word and rely instead on her own &#8220;reasoning&#8221; and the words (ideas) that came of it. She obviously told herself (based on the short book from the serpent) &#8220;that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise&#8221; and so forgetting God and His Word, &#8220;she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate&#8221; Genesis 3.</p>
<p>The world doesn&#8217;t care about &#8220;vital information&#8221; and “necessary facts” it wants you to take your eyes off of God and turn your ears from His Word. Of course, that entails encouraging you to rely your own &#8220;reasoning&#8221; and the &#8220;reasoning&#8221; of secular scientists who say this &#8220;_____&#8221; (fill in the blank) today and that &#8220;_____&#8221; (fill in the blank) tomorrow. </p>
<p>By the way, John Calvin’s claim, &#8220;that truth from non-biblical sources was not just helpful, and not just necessary, but to neglect it is a sin&#8221; is par for that course. The Holy Bible makes no such claim, so why would you need to repent?</p>
<p>&#8220;One sweeping charge may be brought against the whole of Christendom, and that charge is neglect and abuse of the Bible.&#8221; J.C. Ryle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonhoeffer1945</title>
		<link>https://headhearthand.org/blog/2017/10/24/watch-me-call-pastor-n-t-grayshon-to-repentance/#comment-50252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonhoeffer1945]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://headhearthand.org/?p=27313#comment-50252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems incredibly wise to me.  Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems incredibly wise to me.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
