I’ve been thinking a lot about the whole subject of “Holy Hip Hop” or “Christian Rap” since I wrote three blog posts on the subject a couple of years ago. The upshot of it all is that I’ve taken down the blog posts and I want to apologize to my African American brothers and sisters in Christ for four wrongs:
1. It was the wrong time: The Reformed movement among African Americans is still in its infancy, taking baby steps, as it were. It was not the right time to come along with such a strong critique of some of those trying extremely hard to influence the African American community towards a more biblical theology.
2. I was the wrong person: I did not fully appreciate how delicate and volatile race relations were in the USA. For a white Brit to critique African Americans is something like a German criticizing the Jews. Due to painful historical circumstances, for any legitimate critique to get a hearing on issues like this, it really has to come from African American voices. I hope I wasn’t being racist, but I was definitely being racially insensitive.
3. It was the wrong forum: I should not have gone so public with my concerns without first reaching out privately to African American Christians in order to understand the historical and cultural context of this genre of music. As one African American pastor told me recently, when he read my articles, he said, “Just another white guy who doesn’t understand where we’ve come from.” The one huge blessing that has come from my posts is the numerous wonderful African American Christians who have made contact with me and even built friendships with me. It’s been one of the richest experiences of my life to get to know these dear brothers and sisters in the Lord.
4. It was the wrong balance: I had never really written or spoken about African American Christians before. Therefore I had no “credit” in the bank to draw on when I made these critical comments. That was simply stupid. Also, while I did concede the good motives behind the work of many Christian rappers, and I did try to distinguish between the styles of different rappers, I really only highlighted negatives in my articles.
This may seem silly, coming as it does 2-3 years later, when most people have probably forgotten all about it. However, the Lord has been convicting me about this, and I want to follow through by apologizing and by asking my African American brothers and sisters for forgiveness.
One huge positive that’s come out of this for me is that the Lord has given me a heart passion for His beautiful plan of racially integrated churches. I hope and pray that God will yet graciously use me to realize this world-transforming vision.
I’ve turned off the comments on this post as I do not want to start the debate up all over again.
Having been unable to record a podcast last week, you get a double dose today, as we look at some of the questions raised in R.C. Sproul’s lectures on Ezekiel and Daniel. A number of the questions center around how to interpret the highly symbolic language in these books. Spoiler alert: no Tim Challies this week! Please don’t hate me.
God praises people. Far-from-perfect people. Sinful people. Amazing isn’t it? There may be bad things in their past, their present or their future, and yet God praises them and inspired the biblical authors to record that praise.
Part of being perfect as our Father in heaven is perfect, is imitating Him in praising and affirming others, especially when they share good news with us. The popular writers in the Positive Psychology movement have identified four different kinds of response to someone who shares good news with us:
God is an active constructive responder! And so should we be. And not only because it helps us imitate and represent God to others, but because it will do us good too.
Research shows that people who rate their partners as active and constructive responders feel more intimacy and trust, are more satisfied with the relationship, report fewer conflicts, and engage in more fun and relaxing activities together This is because active constructive responding makes people feel validated, understood, and cared for (Jessica Colman, Optimal Functioning)
So next time you’re tempted to “Meh” someone, or worse, remember: “A generous person will prosper; whoever refreshes others will be refreshed” (Proverbs 11:25).
Straight, Bible-believing Christians can Undermine God’s Plan for Marriage too
Erik challenges us to glorify God in love, confession, and distinction of roles.
Christians can’t ignore the uncomfortable reality of mental illness.
Amy Simpson examines our usual responses to depression, schizophrenia, etc., and calls us to better responses. When suicide strikes in the body of Christ is another helpful piece. I don’t agree that “taking one’s own life may well be a sin.” It is always a sin. But I agree that it is not the unforgivable sin. The Grace Alliance, an organization I greatly respect, has Four ways for the church to respond to depression. Paul Tautges provides an excellent suicide assessment tool.
5 Ways to avoid the drain of busyness
Thanks for sharing your lessons with us, Trevin. Glad that you’re human, after all!
Three quickfire ways to improve our sermon points.
3 Principles for Preaching the Pentateuch
Preach expositionally, plainly, and Christologically.
5 Times we tend to overspend
And how to stop.
John Koopman, pastor of Chilliwack Free Reformed Church in British Columbia, sent me this helpful piece explaining how he has learned to avoid extremes in dealing with depression. I’m very grateful to John for taking the time to write this and for doing so in such a compassionate, balanced, and brief manner.
There is a great deal of debate in biblical counseling circles on how depression should be addressed. On the one extreme there are those who claim that depression is simply a disease like cancer – and expressions have been used like ‘cancer of the mind’ and so on. On the other extreme are those who claim that it is simply a lifestyle choice; a lack of discipline; stressful circumstances – and they usually point out that this is the result of sin – perhaps not exclusively but for the most part sinful.
The individuals in these two extremes – often godly and caring people – want us to choose either one or the other extreme. As a result they are often intolerant to individuals who are of the other extreme. Most of us don’t fall into either of these extremes. Those who have personal experience with depression – either themselves or their family members – tend to be more sympathetic to the medical model. Those who have little or no personal experience tend to be attracted to the “it’s a sin” model. We do need to recognize that it is often our own personal experience which taints our perspective on this issue. However, as a pastor I don’t want to choose either extreme – nor does either have a huge impact on how I care for someone pastorally. Pastoral care of them doesn’t depend on the reason for their depression.
Personally, I think we need to be very careful and look at each case individually. Further, I don’t like to be forced to take an either/or approach but prefer the both/and approach when dealing with someone who is depressed. Even with sickness like cancer there are always spiritual aspects to this physical disease. The reality is that regardless of the reason for their depression (and we often can’t determine this absolutely) the person needs help. What do I do when someone calls me that they are depressed? Actually they don’t usually call but I become aware through a family member or friend. How should we pastorally respond to someone who is depressed?
First, we need to be compassionate regardless of the reason (or reasons!) for their depression. For arguments sake, even if the depression is a result of someone’s sin or circumstances (even if those circumstances are of their own making) we need to show compassion. Unfortunately some who have taken the “sin model” have used the approach of the Pharisees in addressing the woman caught committing adultery (John 8). We must show compassion to all individuals who are suffering from depression regardless of its origin.
Second, we need to recognize that man’s various parts (physical, spiritual, emotional) cannot be compartmentalized but must be considered as one whole person. Therefore, I always recommend someone who suffers from depression to make an appointment with their family physician. In the case where it is a “disease of the mind,” medication may be necessary to give stability for the rest of their life. This is clearly the case where genetics are involved – where because of man’s fall into sin the mind has fallen as well. Hopefully, these treatments will become more precise over the years as they continue to study the brain. In the case where there the depression is largely the result of personal sin (and I do believe there are such cases) medication is often needed to give stability so that the depressed person will begin to hear counsel that is given to them. To try to counsel someone who is depressed is very ineffective if their mind is not functioning well. These individuals may only be on medication for a period of time until stability is restore in their lives.
Thirdly, when there is stability continue to show pastoral concern and give appropriate counsel in a kind gentle manner. Often the promises of scripture are most helpful in this regard rather than the exhortations. To lay further obligations on someone who is already depressed will only lead to a heavier burden being laid upon them and actually increase their depression. There may be times that sin needs to be addressed (regardless of the origin of their depression) but that is best done by showing them a better way – the way of life in the gospel! Be on guard because our natural tendency is to judge. Be very careful that you understand their life! Some of these people have struggled for years with something you have only heard second hand. Think about living in their situation – and be compassionate!
In conclusion I’d say that the fact of the matter is that some depression can be mainly physiologically (although perhaps include sinful responses) since depression very clearly runs in families who members live in different settings. Therefore, to deny a link to physical causes in all cases is absolute nonsense in my view. However, to make the argument that depression is always physiological is equally nonsense. I have frequently dealt with people whose sinful circumstances or responses to their circumstances have led to depression. Both are cases that require our pastoral care and sensitivity. The one may be the “blind man” of John 9, while the other might be the “woman caught in adultery” of John 8. Both need our help, although in a slightly different way. As a pastor I often cannot distinguish into which of these two categories a depressed person belongs – but I don’t need to put them in one category or the other in order to help them pastorally. Each requires our pastoral compassion, sensitivity, and counsel.