If you just saw the subtitle, “How a Despised Minority Pushed Back, Beat Death, Found Love, and Changed America for Everyone,” you might think that you were about to read a book about Christianity. Sadly, Linda Hirshman’s book Victory is actually describing “The Gay Revolution’s Triumph” over Christianity.

No point in Christians reading about that, right? Well, I certainly wouldn’t recommend it for most Christians; it’s like watching a slow-motion replay of a loved one being murdered. However, as we tend to learn more from our defeats than our successes, it’s worth using this book to conduct a post-mortem on why the Church has lost so many battles in this fight.

Premature hubris?
Maybe, however, Hirshman’s terminology of “Victory” and “Triumph” is premature. Even a gay activist, like Democratic strategist Richard Socarides (who also served as Special Assistant to President Clinton), thinks so. Just before publication, he pled with Hirshman, “But there’s so much that has not been done. People will think you’re saying it’s over and everyone should go home.” With gay marriage still in the “To-do” column, Socarides probably fears public perceptions of hubris that tend to be punished. He may also be wary of history’s numerous examples of mistimed victory laps.

And notice, while accepting that the Church has lost many battles in this arena, I’m not conceding ultimate defeat in this war. There are many worrying signs, and the momentum seems to be against us. However, who knows, perhaps the title and message of this book might be a (metaphorical) “Haman” moment that stirs up many Christians at such a time as this to take a last glorious stand for the biblical definition and institution of marriage. As we examine Hirshman’s analysis of “The Triumphant Gay Revolution” let’s pray that God will use it to teach us and to stir us to action.

Well-defined Strategy
Hirshman’s basic thesis is that while there are some similarities between the black rights and the feminist movements in terms of tactics, the gay rights movement had a far superior strategy, and therefore achieved much more than these other movements.

She argues that while blacks and women sought tolerance and equal rights, they failed to achieve all they could have because they made the great mistake of merely trying to defend their difference. Gay activists’ aims were much higher; not just tolerance, but approval of their difference; not separate but equal, but rather integrated and admired.

Moral certainty
To achieve this strategy, gay leaders had to make a staggering moral claim: “Gay is good.” Not just acceptable, not just OK, but a moral good. Few Christians have grasped this essential element of the gay agenda. Gay men and women are not like most adulterers and fornicators who know their immorality is bad, but still do it anyway. Gays have convinced themselves that they are not only moral, but that their morality is superior to Christian morality, and therefore should replace it.

As Hirshman says: “It is the moral certainty of the gay revolution that explains why, unlike the racial and feminist movements, it has been able to stand up to that powerful counterforce [the morally driven religious right] and, slowly but surely, prevail.”

Identify your enemies
Standing firmly on this “moral foundation,” gay activists identified four major obstacles to achieving their strategic objective: (1) The churches considered them sinful; (2) The state criminalized their sex acts; (3) Doctors – mainly psychologists – thought they were crazy; and (4) The military feared they would be traitors to the nation.

For gays, conformity with mainstream norms was not an option. The accepted versions of sin, crime, sanity, and loyalty were mortal enemies that had to be taken down and replaced.

Select your primary targets
Hirshman provides a stunning wealth of detail about how the gay movement worked to overcome these “four horsemen of the gay apocalypse” – Sinful, Criminal, Crazy, and Subversive.” However, their core moral claim – “Gay is Good” – required a ruthless focus on the two traditional institutions of heterosexual morality – marriage and the military.

Same-sex marriage guru Evan Wolfson saw that marriage was “the central social and legal institution in any society.” Barring gays from marriage focused “on the core of what makes them different: their sexual and emotional relationships. Challenging marriage discrimination would challenge the core of gay exclusion.”

And as the ban on gays in the military was also based upon a moral belief that “gays were more likely to be unreliable and disloyal” that too had to go.

Collective identity
Although the aim was individual rights, “for a despised and marginalized minority, individualism is never the way to equality. Its members must recognize themselves as an oppressed class and act collectively.”

One thing that comes across in the book is the powerful unity of the multiple diverse strands of the gay movement, although Hirshman admits that a lot of that powerful unity was based on the unifying power of sex – “It’s hard to take the sex out of homosexual.”

Refusal to compromise
Despite many political and judicial victories over the years, the gay movement would not stop short of victory over the military and the church. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) was the unacceptable sop that President Clinton offered to the many gay supporters he had cultivated by over-promising during the 1992 presidential campaign.

But tolerance of secret conduct was nowhere near enough to achieve the longed-for moral approbation. Repeal of DADT was finally accomplished in 2011, together with the removal of the ban on gays serving in the military.

And we can expect the same no-compromise approach to the one remaining bulwark – the prohibition on Gay Marriage. We need to understand that no amount of “Civil Partnership” compromises will satisfy the demand for moral approval.

Never give up
Many thought that AIDS would be the end of the gay movement. However, in what is the most stunning claim in the whole book, Hirshman says, “AIDS was the making of the gay revolution.” And when you read of how the gay community leveraged this setback to secure massive funding not just for medical treatment, but also for educational and community initiatives (in a way that blacks and women never did), you cannot but agree with the claim.

Hirshman says that gays benefited from the legal profession’s “nostalgia for the heroic role it played during the racial civil rights movement…For young lawyers aspiring to be the next Thurgood Marshall, the gay revolution was the civil rights movement of their generation.”

In a section that goes a long way to explaining why the legal culture is so anti-Christian, Hirshman points out that law firms have “become among the best places in America for gay and lesbian employees…The legal sector has the largest number of top-scoring companies in HRC’s Corporate Equality Index, an annual measure of how equitably large private businesses in the United States treat their lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender employees, consumers, and investors.”

The Last Battle
So, it all looks rather grim for Christians. We are facing opponents with a well-defined strategy, and an energizing moral certainty. Their “kill-list” has three out of four successes and they are pursuing the last, “the most resilient horseman of the gay apocalypse—sin” with a united, uncompromising, never-give-up, laser-like focus on gay marriage. And many lawyers – including our President – are out to make a great name for themselves in this final “Triumph.”

Is there anything we can do? I believe there is. We can repent. Yes, lets begin with ourselves, the Christian church, and our own sin: our apathy, our cowardice, our defeatism, our pragmatism, and our inconsistency. Let’s confess it and seek the empowering pardon that Christ alone can give.

We can also pray. Despite our failings, we can pray for God’s mercy to His church and the nation. We can plead, “For your Name’s sake, for your glory’s sake, intervene for your beautiful and blessed institution of marriage. Lord, this is the first and last bastion of Christian morality. If we lose it, we are unlikely to ever see it restored.”

And we can love. Although the majority of the gay movement hold us in contempt – and make no mistake, they do – let’s not return evil for evil. In our personal relationships with gays, and in our public words, while holding firmly to biblical morality, let’s do all we can to smash the caricatures of Christians as gay-haters. Gays have declared themselves our enemies. As such, they are entitled to our love – especially the love of evangelism.

Lastly, let’s not give up on the legal and political avenues open to us. Let’s prayerfully and practically support courageous Christian individuals and organizations who can speak truth to power.

Who knows, maybe in God’s providence Hirshman might have to write another book before too long: “Debacle: How I helped the gay revolution snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.”

This review was first published at The Gospel Coalition.

For Christians and churches struggling with explaining the Biblical position on Homosexuality, here’s a short briefing paper on Homosexuality and the Bible.

  • http://www.callingnz.info Andrew

    There are two strategies that their agenda carried out very well which are ironically Biblical in their basis:
    1. No compromise (which you articulated);
    2. Teach them young.

    Talk about taking a page out of the opponent’s playbook. May I respectfully state that many Christians fail miserably in these two areas? If the warriors keeping compromising and are ill-prepared, is it any wonder why the church lost many battles?

    • Bob Pegram

      In addition, many Christian send their kids to be taught by the enemy – the humanistic, anti-Christian government schools.

  • Mark

    David: Very good post. I would like to add another of “what we can do”… we can be more prepared to engage the public about our convictions and biblical truth. I am a pastor and am pretty sure that most of our people are not prepared to have “the discussion”… instead we tend to go silent when it gets brought up at work or in the community. OR we get angry and spout off bottom line convictions without love. Instead, we pastors and Christian educators need to teach our people how to talk about it, answer the objections and accusations about “hate”, lovingly but unflinchingly bring the biblical texts into the discussion without rancor or apology, etc. I have found that gay activists sometimes actually respect the informed, firm but kind interaction. They are actually surprised by the non-homophobic engagement. I am afraid that by and large our brothers and sisters retreat or attack rather than debate. This we can do! Lets put some energy here.

  • Pingback: Friday’s Five to Live By | Biblical Counseling Coalition Blogs

  • Pingback: Victory? « The Wanderer

  • Christopher Hogan

    Or, you could humbly accept that you were wrong about gay people. And the author of this article completely ignore the many christians who support equality and the majority of gay people who ARE christian. Hey, there is no shame in admitting God’s truth. The church long ago admitted they were wrong about interractial marriages, despite the several biblical passages that clearly condemn it. But strict obediance to tradition, no matter how harmful, for the sole pupose of tradition, is not only blind, but immoral. And you can no longer pretend that the harm you cause for the sake of it isn’t real.

  • http://www.womenshealthvn.com/node/add/forum www.womenshealthvn.Com

    white ceramic michael kors watch Take action today because many states
    have short time limits on reporting these issues. Report him to a state
    labor board right now!If your former employer is personal
    bankruptcy, personnel are generally paid off first from any assets the bankruptcy trustee finds, Whether
    in actual physical assets, Such as equipment that is auctioned off, medical data receivable, consequently on.
    If he will be just closing shop, Then the companies stockholders may become liable.

    The laptop computer feels solidly built; Its hinges are smooth and work of holding
    the screen in place. the battery does rattle around a little
    though (We’ve also seen in other VAIO laptops recently).
    It didn’t cause any problems and the battery
    never fell out while we were using the laptop, The
    world is receiving targeted regulated. an advanced highly regulated brand, so therefore,
    You align to guest needs. And in many cases, You will be
    successful. When cycling in the rain, Brakes are far less efficient
    than when dry, And stopping mileage will greatly increase.
    So brake first on, And pump your brakes gently to try and dry the rims if you
    can. Be searching for metal manhole covers, and various metal
    covers, And avoid at all costs as these can be very slippery.

    prior to early 1900s, Hair coloring was made from a variety of
    herbal and natural dyes. Flying in the face of other
    chemists who found the roll-out of hair coloring trivial and
    unworthy of their time, French chemist Eugene Schuller came up with the first safe commercial hair coloring in 1909.
    His invention took it’s origin from a new chemical, Paraphenylenediamine, And provided the basis of his
    company, in france they Harmless Hair Dye Company, Effect
    of the net loss of jobs may be small, But if a good portion of these jobs were highend
    manufacturing jobs that moved overseas because of intellectual property losses, The effect could be wide
    ranging. Reliance on the information contained in the online news
    publications and other related content published
    on this website is done at your own risk and subject
    to our “finer points, Independent newsprint (Pty) Limited has committed itself to The Press Code of successful Practice which prescribes that news must be reported in a truthful, exact, Fair and healthier manner, The one recent exception seems to be Latvia’s prime minister, Valdis Dombrovskis, Who resigned wedding ceremony wake of the recent mall collapse in Riga that killed 54. Latvia’s longest serving prime minister, He was credited with avoiding the bankruptcy of his country after the 2009 credit crunch. had been no personal failures, No dependence, No consumer misbehaviour. cheap michael kors watch

    whatever i Bring: “My mom always taught me to cook something healthy and delicious so there’d be at least one
    dish I’d want to eat lots of. This year I was inspired by the seasonal quinoa salad supply at Creative
    Juice. My version features red quinoa studded with slow roasted acorn squash and Brussels sprouts.
    He is a law and order former prosecutor is the solution to that question.
    Had he run getting Repubican, The people of Virginia may possibly have
    liked what he stands for. He is those types of annoying people, lasting
    in politics as bisexuals were in bars in the seventies, Or as the
    stuck something or other beetle infesting your plants today, a person who is
    a Democrat in name only, Does anyone know someone who is inexpensive?
    My wedding is easy so I don need all the bells and. My plan for the dress
    is around $300. I do not want to go to a spa for a massage as they are expensive.
    Its potency here antedates the Civil War. the particular business interrelationships that are the lifeblood of
    this local society are inextricably intertwined with it.
    That may prove appropriate somehow. brown michael kors purse
    michael korsr love makes me blind

  • David Dodge

    David Murray’s article about Ms. Hirshman’s book is really an admission of defeat. But there is something more going on that Murray neglects and is furthering the gay movement. This is the fact that many people, not just the young, have redefined God, rethought God, re-adjusted God, restructured God and brought God up to date with the new progressive age. The triumph of the gay movement represents the success of the intellect over an archaic, outdated, outmoded Christian tradition which is no longer valid in our era. Christianity has two choices: either accept the reality of gay marriage or seriously modify the inflammatory, hateful, vindictive and anti-intellectual crap of St. Paul’s “judgment”. The Irish referendum yesterday is a lesson and a warning to everyone stuck in a morality that’s over 2000 years old. We have a new moral relativism now which is good for everyone because it’s more honest and free than that “white middle class Christian family values” morality. We are in the midst of a huge sea change. As with all changes there will be people who are offended and scream “God will punish America” and refuse to change. But as with all positive changes in history, those old believers will just go the way of all unnecessary and invalid and unworkable ideas. Even the Republicans are favoring gay marriage. The anti-gay crowd can thump their Bibles and scream “Sin Sin Sin” all they want, but once history has willed something, it can’t be changed or undone. The Irish election yesterday is a lesson and a warning. But when the dust settles, let’s see what this “new God” can do. Fair enough?