Endtimes Q&A

A month or so ago I made available my first ebook How Sermons Work. My second ebook, Endtimes Q&A (download pdf here) is an expanded version of “The Four (Main) Millennial Views,” which I presented today at the 2010 Philadelphia Conference on Reformed Theology in Grand Rapids.

In the interests of clarity, precision, simplicity and brevity, the material is presented in question and answer (or “catechism”) format.

I’ve used pictures to illustrate and highlight many points. The link between text and picture is not always obvious, but will be all the more memorable if you can work it out!

Proof texts are kept to a minimum, and those I have used are placed in the footnotes to avoid clutter. Many other eschatology books will give you all the necessary scriptural references.

As this is only an introduction to the four main millennial views, I have kept things brief. I have also focused on the mainstream of each view rather than all the variations within each.

Although I have tried to fairly represent the four main millennial views as well as setting out the strengths and weaknesses of each, I am biased toward amillennialism. My original address was somewhat tilted in favor of amillennialism. This ebook is more obviously tilted in that direction. However, whatever your millennial view, I hope that Endtimes Q&A will help you to understand the alternatives better. If I have misrepresented any of the millennial views, I will gladly receive correction.

I am working on an expanded version of this ebook which will deal with the full range of eschatological subjects: death, intermediate state, final judgment, heaven, hell, etc.

I’m very grateful to my research assistant, PRTS student Derek Naves, for his help with the four millennial timelines in my Keynote presentation. I hope to get these posted on this blog next week. Some of the icons Derek designed are on the front cover of the ebook.

 

Combo Final Opto.pdf
Download this file

Splits and sorrys

Bigstockphoto_muddy10a62e9

I lived through a painful church split. Although it was over ten years ago, the awful effects are still being felt in many lives, families and churches.

I believe I ended up on the right side of the divide. However, as I have reflected on my own conduct in the “heat of the battle,” I have often felt convicted by the Holy Spirit that although I believe I did the right thing, I sometimes did it in the wrong way or in the wrong spirit.

As opportunity has arisen I have apologized to certain individuals. My confession and request for forgiveness has always been graciously given, even though we remain firmly convinced of our respective positions in the controversy. Sometimes it produced an apology and confession to me! Always it produced a better relationship between me and the person, and between me and God. I still have some outstanding business to do there as well, but that is a battle still being waged in the depth of my own soul in the shadow of Calvary.

Here’s my advice to anyone recovering from a church division:

1. Try to distinguish between doing the right thing and doing the right thing in the wrong way or in the wrong spirit. Doing the right thing does not “atone” for doing it in the wrong way or spirit.

2. If you have done even 1% wrong, confess it to God and the person wronged, even if you are 99% right.

3. Even if you have been more sinned against than sinned, still confess that sin to God and to any other person involved.

4. Encourage others “on your side” to do the same, regardless of the conduct of any “opponent.”

5. No matter how much you are provoked, don’t keep bringing up the matter in the pulpit, in blogs, or in church newsletters. No church division is neat and tidy. You will probably end up with many on your side of the divide who still have dear friends across the trenches. They will not enjoy you presenting yourself as whiter than white, and the others as “the principalities and powers” that you are wrestling against.

And if you need more help to utter that hardest of words “sss……sss…sorry,” then read Apologies are a sign of strength, which concludes with:

When you are at fault, you might fear that admitting an error is admitting weakness. On the contrary, apologies are a sign of strength. Adversity is an opportunity to show your true colors. It is remarkable when a leader is so confident and self-aware that he or she is able to simply apologize. Personally, I find it inspiring.


Who sinned? This man or his parents?

I’m thankful to God for David Powlison, together with his predecessors and successors in the Biblical Counseling movement. By God’s grace, they have restored the pastor’s role in counseling, and led a wonderful reformation of church counseling practice. Their books have been blessed to me personally, and I use their materials extensively in our counseling classes at Puritan Seminary. Recently I was sent this video interview with Dr Powlison.

I agree with Dr Powlison:

1. Psychiatric drugs, like many drugs, are often prescribed to treat symptoms instead of dealing with the causes, the issues of meaning and relationship.

2. Psychiatric drugs, like most drugs to some extent, are often over-prescribed and overused.

3. Psychiatric drugs, like many other drugs, can have a placebo effect in some people.

However, I do have some pastoral concern with some of the emphases in this interview. It is difficult to comment on the paraphrase of the remarks attributed to the Director of the NIMH by Dr Powlison (if anyone can supply me with the exact words and larger context, I would be very grateful). But I’m a bit concerned lest by overreacting to over-use or abuse of medication, we end up with under-use or non-use, especially if it is a life-or-death situation. Also, though some studies do show a significant placebo effect with psychiatric drugs, I would not be quite so dismissive about alleviating the suffering of one third of millions of people with depression.

My major concern though is with Dr Powlison repeatedly describing psychiatric drugs, and the SSRI’s in particular, as only dealing with “symptom alleviation.” Implicitly and explicitly Dr Powlison says again and again that there are always underlying “issues” or causes. The issues are “meaning or relationship,” or “what you are living for and how you are living,” or “the two great commandments.” In other words, the default position in dealing with a depressed person is that their personal sin has caused it, they are responsible for it, and so they must repent and believe the Gospel. Of course, personal sin can and often does cause (or contribute to) depression and anxiety, just as personal sin can and often does cause (or contribute to) heart disease, or certain types of diabetes, or even blindness. But these same diseases and disabilities can also be the result, not of personal sin, but of living in a fallen body in a fallen world.

Just as the curse on this world and our bodies can cause mechanical, chemical and electrical problems in our hearts, our livers, our pancreas, our eyes, etc., so we can also have mechanical, chemical and electrical problems in our brains, which may affect the way we think, and even our personalities. I’m sure we have all seen loved ones with brain injuries, bleeds, or tumors dramatically and painfully change in this way. Nutritionists have also demonstrated how certain foods can affect our moods and thoughts, our feeling and thinking.

The brain is the most complex organ in our body, and so is liable to be the most affected of all our organs by the fall and the divine curse upon our bodies. And as processing our thoughts is the main activity of our brain, we can expect this area at times to fail and break, through no fault of our own, with subsequent emotional and behavioral problems. (And that’s not to deny that a person is responsible for how they respond to mechanical, chemical, or electrical failures and faults in any part of their body.)

In these cases, medication is not merely alleviating symptoms, but addressing the causes. It is no different to me giving my 8-year-old daughter one of her many daily injections of insulin for diabetes. I am not merely alleviating symptoms, but addressing the cause – depleted insulin due to dying or dead cells in her pancreas. And if she is lethargic, weepy, or irrational due to low sugar levels, I do not ask her what commandments she has broken or what “issues of meaning and relationship” she has in her life. I pity her, weep for her, and thank God for His gracious provision of medicine for her.

If we come to the point that our default position in dealing with depression is “it’s sin until proven otherwise,” we are getting painfully close to the disciples position, “Who sinned? This man or his father?” (John 9:2). It is also getting worryingly close to the “health, wealth, and prosperity gospel,” in terms of diagnosis (personal sin) and prescription (more repentance and faith).

I realize that many in the biblical counseling movement have “moved” on the use of psychiatric drugs, and I welcome that. I also realize, as Dr Powlison said, that there are various views within the movement (see Ed Welch’s careful and sensitive Blame it on the brain?). We are all continuing to learn from God and from one another in the community of faith. I dread to think where we would be today without the courageous and wise leadership of the Biblical Counseling Movement.

But I started by saying that my concern was pastoral rather than polemical. And I mean that. Maybe it would help if I explained the particular pastoral context I’m thinking of. I was a pastor for 12 years on the west coast of the Scottish Highlands. Sadly, that beautiful area has one of the highest rates of depression in the western world, and I dealt with many Christians who endured years of mental suffering and spiritual darkness. Although initially, in my youthful zeal, I probed for the sin or “issues,” because I did not want just to “alleviate symptoms,” I came to realize that I was often (though not always) dealing with people whose problem was not “issues of meaning or relationship.” As I got to know them, I came to see that what they were living for and how they were living was not the problem; they were unquestionably living for Christ, and living like Christ.  In fact they were among the most godly Christians I have ever met. The Lord was everything to them and they would not let go of Him despite everything screaming from within and without, “There is no God.”

So, I would encourage pastors dealing with depression to fight strongly against adopting the default of “it’s sin until proven otherwise,” or as Dr Powlison says, “there are always issues, underlying issues”, or “it’s about what they are living for and how they are living,” or “its about the two great commandments.” It may well be. But let’s not begin there and so potentially damage some of the precious people of God in their moments of greatest weakness.


Drive-by culture and the endless search for wow

Bigstockphoto_wow_r1023242

Should I write blog posts that increase my traffic or that help change the way (a few) people think?

That’s the question mega-blogger Seth Godin honestly grapples with in Drive-by culture and the endless search for wow. When he is writing content, should he aim for more clicks on his blog, or more change by his blog?

Is this not a question we can transfer to our preaching? Are we aiming for more people through our church doors or more change in our people. To put it another way, are we trying to create a momentary and increasingly elusive “Wow!” or a lasting and influential “Whoa!”?

Godin illustrates his point both with Time Magazine and The Huffington Post:

The Huffington Post has downgraded itself, pushing thoughtful stories down the page in exchange for linkbait and sensational celebrity riffs. This strategy gets page views, but does it generate thought or change?

Could he have easily used our sermons to illustrate his point? Are we substituting substantial and thoughtful Gospel sermons for “linkbait” and the “sensational,” generating piles of “new vistor” cards but little “thought or change?”

Godin concludes by describing the race between “who” and “how many,” and urges us to back the former rather than the latter – if action is our goal.

Find the right people, those that are willing to listen to what you have to say, and ignore the masses that are just going to race on, unchanged.

Obviously, as Christians who love the souls of the perishing, we don’t want to “ignore the masses,” but I think you get Godin’s point.

I don’t want to preach “Wow…drive-by” sermons. I want to preach “Whoa…rest-stop” sermons.


Psalm 77 Therapy

Yesterday I listed the various false thought-patterns that can have an adverse knock-on effect in our souls, our emotions and our behavior. How do we break this “vicious circle?”

In Psalm 77, Asaph walks us through his own struggle and helps us to identify our false thoughts, then challenge and change them – with all the knock-on benefits that result. Below, I’ve set out ten steps of “Psalm 77 therapy.” The second column examines Asaph’s case, while the first column states the principles we can apply in our own situations.

Psalm 77 Therapy.pdf
Download this file

You are what you think

The Bible says, “As a man thinks in his heart, so is he” (Prov. 23:7). In other words, what we think impacts our emotions, our behavior, and our spiritual lives. Below I’ve listed ten false thought-patterns which have been widely recognized as having a negative emotional, behavioral, and spiritual impact. I’ll summarize each thought-habit and then provide three examples: one from “ordinary” life, another from our “spiritual life,” and another from the Bible. And tomorrow, I’ll propose “Psalm 77 Therapy” as the way to break these harmful thought patterns and create more accurate and biblical ways of thinking.

1. False extremes

This is the tendency to evaluate our personal qualities in extreme, black or white categories – shades of gray do not exist. This is sometimes called “all-or-nothing thinking.”  

Life example: You make one mistake in cooking a meal and conclude you are a total disaster.

Spiritual example: You have a sinful thought in prayer and conclude that you are an apostate.

Biblical example: Despite most of his life being characterized by God’s blessing and prosperity, when Job passed through a time of suffering he decided he must be an enemy of God (Job 13:24; 33:10) 

2. False generalization

This happens when, after experiencing one unpleasant event, we conclude that the same thing will happen to us again and again.

Life example: If a young man’s feelings for a young woman are rebuffed, he concludes that this will always happen to him and that he will never marry any woman.

Spiritual example: When you try to witness to someone, you are mocked and you conclude that this will always happen to you and that you will never win a soul for Christ.

Biblical example: At a low point in his own life Jacob deduced that because Joseph was dead, and Simeon was captive in Egypt, that Benjamin would also be taken from him  (Gen. 42:36). “All these things are against me,” he generalized.

3. False filter

We tend to pick out the negative in every situation and think about it alone, to the exclusion of everything else. We filter out anything positive and so decide everything is negative.

Life example: You get 90% in an exam but all you can think about is the 10% you got wrong.

Spiritual example: You heard something in a sermon you did not like or agree with, and went home thinking and talking only about that part of the service.

Biblical example: Despite having just seen God’s mighty and miraculous intervention on Mt Carmel, Elijah filtered out all the positives and focused only on the continued opposition of Ahab and Jezebel (1 Kings 19:10). 

4. False transformation

We transform neutral or positive experiences into negative ones. Positive experiences are not ignored but are disqualified or turned into their opposite.

Life example: If someone compliments you, you conclude that they are just being hypocritical, or that they are trying to get something from you.

Spiritual example: When you receive a blessing from a verse or a sermon, you decide that it is just the devil trying to deceive you.

Biblical example: Jonah saw many Ninevites repent in response to his preaching. But, instead of rejoicing in this positive experience his mood slumped so low that he angrily asked God to take away his life (Jonah 4:3-4).

5. False mind-reading

We may think that we can tell what someone is thinking about us, that they hate us or view us as stupid. But such negative conclusions usually are not supported by the facts.

Life example: A friend may pass you without stopping to talk because, unknown to you, he is late for a meeting. But you conclude that he no longer likes you.

Spiritual example: Someone who used to talk to you at church now passes you with hardly a word, and so you decide that you have fallen out of her favour. But, unknown to you, the person’s marriage is in deep trouble and they are too embarrassed to risk talking to anyone.

Biblical example: The Psalmist one day concluded that all men were liars, a judgment which on reflection he admitted to be over-hasty (Ps. 116:11).

6. False fortune-telling

This occurs when we feel so strongly that things will turn out badly, our feelings-based prediction becomes like an already-established fact. We expect catastrophe and the expectation itself produces hopelessness and helplessness.

Life example: You feel sure that you will always be depressed and that you will never be better again. This is despite the evidence that almost everybody eventually recovers.

Spiritual example: You are convinced that you will never be able to pray in public. Again this is despite the evidence that, though difficult at first, with practice almost everybody manages it.

Biblical Example: Anticipating the opposition that Jesus would face in Bethany, Thomas falsely predicted not only his own death there but also that of the Lord and the other disciples (John 11:16).

7. False lens

This is when we view our fears, errors, mistakes through a magnifying glass, and so deduce catastrophic consequences. Everything then is out of proportion.

Life example: When you make a mistake at work, you conclude, “I’m going to lose my job!”

Spiritual example: You focus on your sins from the distant past in a way that leads to continued feelings of guilt, self-condemnation, and fear of punishment.

Biblical example: When Peter sinfully denied the Lord, he not only wept bitterly but decided that as his mistake was so spiritually catastrophic, there was no alternative but to forget about preaching Christ and go back to catching fish (John. 21:3).

The other side of this is that while you maximize your faults with a magnifying glass, you also tend to look through the binoculars the wrong way when it comes to your assets, and so minimize them!

8. False feelings-based reasoning

We tend to take our emotions as the truth. We let our feelings determine the facts.

Life example: You feel you have cancer and therefore conclude that you do have cancer.

Spiritual example: You feel unforgiven and so conclude you are unforgiven. You feel cut off from God and so conclude that you are cut off from God

Biblical example: At one of his low points, David felt and so hastily concluded that he was cut off from God. “I said in my haste, I am cut off from before thine eyes” (Ps. 31:22).

9. False “shoulds”

Our lives may be dominated by “shoulds” or “oughts,” applied to ourselves or others. This heaps pressure on us and others to reach certain unattainable standards and causes frustration and resentment when we or others fail.

Life example: The busy mother who tries to keep as tidy and orderly a house as when there were no children is putting herself under undue pressure to reach unattainable standards.

Spiritual example: The conscientious Christian who feels that despite being responsible for meals and raising children, she ought also to be at every prayer meeting and service of worship, and also reading good books and feeling close to God.

Biblical example: Martha felt deep frustration that Mary was not fulfilling what she felt were her obligations and complained bitterly about it (Luke 10:40-42).

10. False responsibility

This is when we assume responsibility and blame ourselves for a negative outcome, even when there is no basis for this.

Life example: When your child does not get “A” grades you conclude that you are an awful mother. The reason may be instead that your child has a poor teacher or that the child does not have academic gifts.

Spiritual example: When your child turns against the Lord and turns his back on the church, you assume that, despite doing everything you humanly could to bring him up for the Lord, it is all your fault.

Biblical example: Moses felt responsible for the negative reactions of Israel to God’s providence, and was so cast down about this that he prayed for death (Num. 11:14-15).

BUT there is a way to break these damaging thought-patterns. It’s called “Psalm 77 Therapy” and we will look at that tomorrow.